Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I was wondering if there was any meaningful interpertation of the product of two $n\times n$ adjacency matrices of two distinct graphs.

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

The story extends to non-square matrices. Consider a collection $A$ of $a$ vertices, another collection $B$ of $b$ vertices, and a collection of directed edges from the first collection to the second (in other words, a bipartite graph, but where we choose explicitly a $2$-coloring of the vertices). We can organize this data into a $b \times a$ matrix whose entries describe the number of edges from a vertex in the first collection to a vertex in the second.

Now consider a third collection $C$ of $c$ vertices and some directed edges from vertices in $B$ to vertices in $C$. We can organize this data into a $c \times b$ matrix as above.

Then the product of the two matrices above is a $c \times a$ matrix describing how to get from vertices in $A$ to vertices in $C$ by following edges that go through $B$.

This idea is the basis of a combinatorial approach to linear algebra which is described, for example, in Brualdi and Cvetkovic's A combinatorial approach to matrix theory and its applications.

For the initiated, the above admits the following nice interpretation: we have described composition of morphisms of a particularly nice category. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, it's the free category with finite biproducts on one object.

share|improve this answer
Did you buy or download a pirate copy? ;) –  user10389 Feb 28 '12 at 22:24
add comment

Suppose $A$ is the adjacency matrix of graph $G_1$ and $B$ the adjacency matrix of graph $G_2$, where we consider both $G_1$ and $G_2$ to have the same vertices $1,\ldots,n$. Then $(AB)_{ij}$ is the number of ways to get from $i$ to $j$ by going first along an edge of $G_1$ and then along an edge of $G_2$.

share|improve this answer
These sorts of results seem too good to be true. –  Chris Dugale Feb 28 '12 at 6:48
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.