Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given that $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are roots of the following polynom, show that for $ a \neq 0$

$$( f(x)=ax^2 + bx + c ) \rightarrow f(x)=a(x-\alpha)(x-\beta)$$

I have a question regarding a step in this proof. I'll outline it quickly:

We're given a few theorems to work with. Briefly:

  1. Division of a polynomial with remainder
  2. $\alpha$ is a root of $f(x)$ iff $(x-\alpha)|f(x)$
  3. if $p(x)=q(x)$ then all their coefficients are equal

The first thing we observe is that: $$f(x)=ax^2 + bx + c=h(x)(x-\alpha)(x-\beta)$$

Now here is where I diverge from the proof in the book and have my question. I would open up the right side and observe that:

$$f(x)=h(x)(x^2-(\alpha+\beta)x+\alpha\beta)=h(x)x^2-h(x)(\alpha + \beta)x + h(x)\alpha\beta$$

and according to theorem 3 $h(x)=a$.

However in the book there is an intermediate step in which they prove that $h(x)$ is a constant function. I don't understand why that step is necessary.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Coefficients in a polynomial are constants, by definition. So you can't treat $h(x)$ as a valid coefficient for the purpose of theorem 3 unless you know that it is a constant first.

To elaborate a little bit: $x^2+x\cdot x+1=2x^2+1$, but you can't conclude from this that $1=2$, $x=0$, and $1=1$ (thought the last bit at least is true).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.