Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is a Lorentz reflection of $\mathbb R^3$? Is there a way to visualize it? Suppose I have a plane, P, what would (Lorentz) reflecting in it differ from (Euclid) reflecting in it?

I know that the Lorentzian metric is one where the inner product $(x,y)=x_1y_1+x_2y_2-x_3y_3$ but is the reflection along the (Euclidean) orthogonal to P but ending up at points with distance wrt the given metric?

In the Euclidean case, for $n\in \mathbb R^3$ such that $n$ is a unit vector normal to a plane P, the reflection in P is given by $R(x)=x-2(x,n)n$ , where $x\in \mathbb R^3$.

Is the equation for the Lorentzian case the same except the inner product $(.,.)$ is the Lorentzian one?

share|cite|improve this question
I don't think this is commonly used terminology in physics. Certain authors may define it, but if you use the term, probably other people will not understand you. Physicists usually define a time reflection operator T that does $t\rightarrow -t$, and a spatial reflection operator P (for parity) according to $(x,y,z)\rightarrow(-x,-y,-z)$. – Ben Crowell Feb 27 '12 at 1:36
Using the Lorentz metric, not all nonzero vectors $v$ can be normalized to have $(v,v) = 1$, but rather to $\pm 1$ if $(v,v) \not= 0$. In ${\mathbf R}^3$, for a nonzero vector $v$ the Euclidean reflection across the plane perp. to $v$ is given by $R(x) = x - 2((x,v)/(v,v))v$. This formula works regardless of whether or not $(v,v)=1$. The same exact formula defines a reflection when $(\cdot,\cdot)$ is the Lorentz metric, provided $(v,v) \not= 0$. In Euclidean geometry the only vector whose norm is 0 is the vector 0, but in Lorentz geometry more vectors have norm 0 than the zero vector. – KCd Jan 29 '13 at 12:52

Expanding the comment by KCd: if $(\cdot , \cdot )$ is a symmetric bilinear form on $\mathbb R^n$ and $v$ is a vector such that $(v,v)\ne 0$, then the map $$ R(x)=x-2\frac{(x,v)}{(v,v)}v \tag1 $$ defines an involution on $\mathbb R^n$ that preserves $(\cdot , \cdot )$.

Involution: since $(R(x),v)=-(x,v)$, it follows that $$R(R(x)) = R(x)+2\frac{(x,v)}{(v,v)}v = x \tag2$$

Form-preserving: $$ \begin{split} (R(x),R(y))&=(x,y)-2\frac{(x,v)}{(v,v)}(v,y)-2\frac{(y,v)}{(v,v)}(v,x)+4\frac{(x,v)(y,v)}{(v,v)^2}(v,v) \\ & = (x,y) \end{split} \tag3 $$

share|cite|improve this answer
No pictures? But it's tagged [intuition]! :P – Mario Carneiro Jun 13 '13 at 14:49
@MarioCarneiro If the OP (who put the tag) requests a picture, I'll try to come up with one. But s/he was last seen Feb 27 '12. – ˈjuː.zɚ79365 Jun 13 '13 at 14:55

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.