Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

given a surface with metric $ g_{ab} $ i would like to evaluate the functional determinant of the Laplacian in the form

$ - \partial _{s} \zeta (0,E^{2})=\log\det( \Delta + E^{2}) $

then i need to evaluate the Theta function $ \Theta (t)= \sum_{n} \exp(-tE_{n})$ for $t >0$ real

since this is too hard :( my idea is to use the approximation

$ \Theta (t) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d}} \int dpdx\exp(-tH(x,p)) $

with the Hamiltonian of the surface $ H(x,p)= \sum_{a,b}g^{a,b}(x)p_{a}p_{b} $ summation over indices $a$ and $b$ is assumed :)

my question is if this approximation for the 'Theta function' or Heat Kernel of the Laplacian of the surface is valid, i need the Theta function in order to evaluate the determinant of the Laplacian by zeta-regularization.

share|improve this question
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.