Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

For characters, $\chi$ and $\rho$, if $k\in \mathbb{F_{p}}$ with $k\neq0$ and $\chi^{2}\neq \epsilon$, then suppose $\sum_{t}\chi{(t(k-t))}=\chi{(k^{2}/2^2)}J(\chi,\rho)$.

How can I show that $g(\chi)^{2}=\chi{2}^{-2}J(\chi,\rho)g(\chi^{2})$?

share|improve this question
2  
This is exactly exercise 5 to Chapter 8 of Ireland & Rosen's Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory. Why didn't you tell us where the problem is coming from, for context? –  KCd Feb 24 '12 at 18:09

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The $\chi(2)$ and $J(\chi,\rho)$ terms are constant so are more or less irrelevant to the computation.

$$\left(\sum_{t} \chi(t)\zeta^t \right)^2 = \sum_{k}\left(\sum_{t+l=k}\chi(t)\chi(l)\right)\zeta^k=\sum_{k}\left(\sum_{t} \chi\big(t(k-t)\big)\right)\zeta^k $$

$$=\sum_{k} \chi(k^2/4)J(\chi,\rho) \zeta^k=\chi(2)^{-2}J(\chi,\rho)\sum_{k} \chi^2(k)\zeta^k=\frac{J(\chi,\rho)g(\chi^2)}{\chi(2)^2}.$$

The only real issue is noting that $\sum_{t+l=k}$ can be replaced with $\sum_t$ as long as we replace $l$ with $k-t$.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks! this is the part is was stuck on. –  Edison Feb 24 '12 at 20:09

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.