Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In $(\ell ^\infty,{\Vert .\Vert_\infty)}$, how would I show that $x_n=\left(\frac{n+1}{n},\frac{n+2}{2n},\frac{n+3}{3n}, ...\right)$ converges and how would I find the limit?

I tried using the fact that the uniform norm ${\Vert .\Vert_\infty}= \text{sup}|X_n|$ and the definition of convergence is that given $\epsilon > 0$, there exists $N \in \mathbb N$ such that $d(x_n,x)< \epsilon$ for all $n>N$, but I cant seem to show it converges. How would I show it converges and find the limit?

share|cite|improve this question
If it converges, then it will converge pointwise, i.e., in every coordinate. This helps to find the limit. – abatkai Feb 19 '12 at 22:51
@abatkai, Hi, thanks for your reply. I haven't really covered pointwise limits etc. I think I was meant to show it converges using the definition of convergence. Is it possible to do it working from the definition? – Aaron Feb 19 '12 at 23:00
Yes, but you need first a candidate for the limit; otherwise you cannot use the definition. – abatkai Feb 19 '12 at 23:03
To use the definition, you need to know what the limit is. @abatkai was suggesting a way to determine that: find the limit of the first coordinates, find the limit of the second coordinates, etc., form a sequence $x$ with those limits as its coordinates, and then use the definition to show that $x_n\to x$. – Brian M. Scott Feb 19 '12 at 23:03
What you get is what chessmath answered. – abatkai Feb 19 '12 at 23:04
up vote 1 down vote accepted

We denote $x^{(n)}$ the sequence of sequences. Then $x_k^{(n)}=\frac{n+k}{kn}=\frac 1k+\frac 1n$, and we can write $x^{(n)}=a^{(n)}+b^{(n)}$ where $a^{(n)}_k=\frac 1k$ for all $n$ and $b_k^{(n)}=\frac 1n$. We have $||b^{(n)}||_{\infty}=\frac 1n$ which converges to $0$ and $a^{(n)}$ doesn't depend on $n$. Denoting this sequence $a$, we can see that $\lim_{n\to\infty}||x^{(n)}-a||_{\infty}=\lim_{n\to\infty}||b^{(n)}||_{\infty}=0$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks Davide, interesting to see a different way of writing it. – Aaron Feb 19 '12 at 23:42

Try the limit $(1,1/2,1/3,..., 1/k,...)$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for your help, most appreciated. – Aaron Feb 19 '12 at 23:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.