Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I should prove that the teardop $S^2(p)$ (the orbifold with underlying surface $S^2$ and a single cone point of order $p>1$) and the spindle $S^2(p,q)$ (the orbifold with underlying surface $S^2$ and two cone points of orders $p,q>1$, $p\neq q$) are bad orbifolds, that is they are not orbifold covered by any surface. I worked out the teardrop case using an argument involving the Euler characteristic, but the same idea fails with the spindle. I guess I should find a geometric proof for the spindle, but I tried without any success. Could you help me with that? Thank you.

share|cite|improve this question

The central idea is that orbifolds have universal covers, much like manifolds. So an orbifold, $X$, is covered by a unique simply connected cover. This space also covers every connected cover of $X$. Now an orbifold that is not a manifold can never cover one that is. (A covering map cannot destroy all the singular points, since the image of a singular point must be singular.) Therefore, the universal cover of every good orbifold is a manifold.

What is the universal cover of the tear-drop? What of the $p \neq q$ spindle?

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.