Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have the following problem:

Problem. Find a conformal mapping from $\{|z-8|<16\}\setminus\{|z-3|<9\}$ onto $\{t<|z|<1\}$. Find $t$.

I know a conformal mapping is one whose derivative doesn't vanish, but nothing more. How should I be thinking about this problem? Is there a standard way of solving it? And what does "find $t$" mean? Is it only possible to find the conformal mapping with one particular value of $t$ and not with other values?

share|cite|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

A conformal mapping of a domain $\Omega$ in the $z$-plane onto a domain $\Omega'$ in the $w$-plane is provided by an analytic function $z\mapsto w:=f(z)$ defined in $\Omega$ and mapping $\Omega$ bijectively onto $\Omega'$. From general properties of such functions it follows that $f'(z)\ne0$ in $\Omega$.

In the example at hand there are several circles involved, in the $z$-plane as well as in the $w$-plane. Therefore we are lead to the conjecture that the required mapping can be realized as a Moebius transformation. So let's use that as a working hypothesis. Such transformations have the form $$f(z)={az+b\over cz+d}$$ and map circles (:= circles or lines) onto circles to start with. The real axis in the $z$-plane is a circle that intersects both circles $|z-8|=16$ and $|z-3|=9$ orthogononally; therefore its image is a circle that intersects both circles $|w|=1$ and $|w|=t>0$ orthogonally, i.e., is a line through $0$ in the $w$-plane. We may as well assume that this image is the real axis; so $a$, $\ldots$, $d$ can be assumed to be real. One more point: Since the given circles are not concentric, but the image circles are, the map $f$ cannot be a similarity. Therefore $c\ne0$, and we may as well assume $c=1$.

So we are now looking for a function $$f(z)={az+b\over z+d}\ , \qquad a,b,d\in{\mathbb R}$$ satisfying $$f(-8)=-1,\quad f(24)=1,\quad f(-6)=- f(12)\ .$$ Solving for $a$, $b$, $d$ we find two such functions, only one of which could possibly solve our problem, namely $$f(z)={2z\over 24+z}\ .$$ It follows from general properties of Moebius transformations that this is indeed the solution of the given problem and that the inner radius $t$ of the image annulus is given by $t=f(12)={2\over3}$.

Is this map essentially the only solution of the given problem? If there were another function $g$ mapping the given domain $\Omega$ onto an annulus $t'<|w|<1$ with $t' > t$ then $h:=g\circ f^{-1}$ would be a conformal map of an annulus onto an inherently thinner annulus. It is a deep theorem of complex analysis that this is impossible. Similarly, if $t'=t$, one can prove that $h$ has to be a rotation $w\mapsto e^{i\alpha} w$. This means that $f$ and $g$ are essentially the same.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you! I started reading about Mobius transormations and I think I understand the idea. I'm not sure about one thing, still. The choice of Mobius transformations as the class of functions you're condidering seems arbitrary. And the $t$ you obtained was due to this choice. Can we say it's a unique $t$ for all possible conformal maps or just for Mobius transformations? –  Bartek Feb 20 '12 at 0:29
@Bartek: See my edit. –  Christian Blatter Feb 20 '12 at 9:30
Thanks! What is the name of the theorem you are referring to? –  Bartek Feb 20 '12 at 10:29
@ Bartek: The theorem has no name. It is a consequence of the Schwarz lemma (see Ahlfors' "Complex analysis") applied to the universal covering $\tilde\Omega$ of the annulus in question. –  Christian Blatter Feb 20 '12 at 19:27

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.