Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The following exercise is drawn from Ch.14 of Fulton's "Algebraic Topology: A First Course."

Use the Van Kampen theorem to compute the fundamental groups of: (1) the sphere with $g$ handles; (2) the complement of $n$ pts. in the sphere with $g$ handles; and (3) the sphere with $h$ crosscaps.

Compared to other applications of Van Kampen (such as providing one flavor of proof that the fundamental group of $S^n$ is trivial if $n>1$), these appear more challenging, and I have spent a couple of hours trying to verify the assumptions requisite for applying Van Kampen in, say, part (1), but without much success. Perhaps part of the trouble is that I don't have the right picture in my head. I wanted to see if anyone visiting would be up for walking me through how to think about these more interesting applications of Van Kampen.

share|cite|improve this question
The sphere with $g$ handles is the union of subspaces $A, B$ where $A$ is the sphere with $g-1$ handles, $B$ is a handle, and $A \cap B$ is (a thickening of) the disjoint union of two circles. Induct on $g$. Have you tried this? – Qiaochu Yuan Feb 18 '12 at 8:22
up vote 5 down vote accepted

I recall enjoying the van Kampen exercises in grad school, so I will give this one a try. The topologists can hopefully add more helpful answers.

As the first example consider the sphere with a single handle, i.e. the torus. You hopefully already know the answer, so let's see how van Kampen does it. We are to split the torus into two parts, $U$ and $V$ with a path-connected intersection, such that we know the fundamental group of $U,V$ and $U\cap V$. Let $V$ be just a small open disk on the surface of the torus. Let $K$ be an even smaller closed disk inside $V$, and let $U$ be the complement of $K$ on the entire torus, so $U\cap V = V\setminus K$ is an open annulus around the perimeter of $V$.

$V$ is contractible and has a trivial fundamental group.

$U\cap V$ contracts to a circle, and has the infinite cyclic group as the fundamental group. A generator of this group is the loop $g$ going once around the circle.

$U$ is essentially the torus with a hole in it made by the removal of the patch $K$. By making that hole bigger and bigger, we eventually see that $U$ contracts to a figure eight 8. If we look at the torus as a bicycle tube, then $U$ is the tube with the valve and its surroundings removed, and it contracts to the union of a big circle $x$ (the points that would touch the ground, if you rotate the wheel 360 degrees) and one small circle $y$ around the tube. These two circles intersect at a single point. So the fundamental group of $U$ is the free group on two generators $x$ and $y$.

What does van Kampen tell us about the fundamental group of the union $U\cup V$? Basically we get the free product of the fundamental groups of $U$ and $V$, but we need to do a bunch of identifications by introducing relations that equate the images (under the induced by the inclusion map) of the elements of $\pi_1(U\cap V)$ on either side.

Here $\pi_1(U\cap V)=\langle g\rangle$, so we only need to check, what kind of a relation we get by equating the image of $g$ in $\pi_1(U)$ and $\pi_1(V)$. In $\pi_1(V)$ the image of $g$ is, of course, trivial, because the loop trivially contracts to a point, once we allow it to pass into $K$. The fun part is to observe that when we "expand the hole $K$ to the complement of the figure 8", the loop $g$ becomes the commutator $xyx^{-1}y^{-1}$ (alter the order of the factors depending on the choices of the orientations that you made).

You may need to draw a picture to see this happening. As a substitute I would suggest that if we form the torus by glueing together the opposite sides of a rectangle in the usual way, then $K$ is a hole in the middle, $g$ is a loop around it, the figure 8 is the border of the rectangle with the obvious identifications, and "expanding the hole" results in pressing the loop to go once around the perimeter of the square.

Anyway, van Kampen tells us now to identify $xyx^{-1}y^{-1}$ with the trivial element turning the free group on two generators into a free abelian group on two generators. The powers of $g$ don't introduce any new relations, so we are done.

share|cite|improve this answer
Does Fulton give the version of the theorem with more than one basepoint? That allows the computation of the fundamental group of the circle, which is, after all, THE basic example in algebraic topology. – Ronnie Brown Apr 26 '12 at 16:32
@Ronnie, I don't have a copy of Fulton, sorry. You should ask Vulcan. – Jyrki Lahtonen Apr 26 '12 at 16:44

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.