Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm reading Jones' book Lebesgue integration on Euclidean space. Let $u(x, y)$ be a harmonic function on the half space $\mathbb{R}^n \times (0, \infty)$, with boundary condition $f(x) = u(x, 0)$. On p. 341, he concludes that

$$\displaystyle f(x) = (2\pi)^{-n} \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} e^{ix \cdot \xi} \hat{f}(\xi) \; d\xi$$ $$\displaystyle u(x, y) = (2\pi)^{-n} \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} e^{-|\xi|y + ix \cdot \xi} \hat{f}(\xi) \; d\xi$$

He then asks, "Do you see what has happened? We have essentially discovered that it is very easy to solve [the Dirichlet problem] in case the given function on $\partial G$ is $e^{ix \cdot \xi}$ for some fixed $\xi \in \mathbb{R}^n$; the solution is exactly $e^{-|\xi|y + ix \cdot \xi}$."

I don't see what happened. I substitute $f(x) = e^{ix \cdot \xi}$ into the above and I get nowhere with this.

share|improve this question
    
Take $\hat{f}$ to be a Dirac delta at $\xi$. –  Robert Israel Feb 17 '12 at 0:04
    
So $\hat{f} = 0$ except at $\xi$, where it is 1. But then the integral $\int_{\mathbb{R}^n} e^{ix \xi} \hat{f}(\xi) \; d\xi = 0$. So $f(x) = 0$? But we assume $f(x) = e^{ix \cdot \xi}$. I am confused. –  user980123 Feb 17 '12 at 0:06
    
If the Dirac delta is confusing, forget about. Simply check that the given solution indeed satisfies the equation and has the right boundary condition. No integrals needed. –  user53153 Feb 11 '13 at 13:22
add comment

1 Answer

I guess this question might be solved or abandoned right now but Dirac delta is infinity at xi and zero otherwise.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.