Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose we have the $n \times n$ block matrix $$M = [M_{i,j}] = M_{1,1} \oplus \cdots \oplus M_{n,n}$$ such that each $M_{i,i}$ is also square and has exactly one eigenvalue $\lambda_i$ and $\lambda_i = \lambda_j \implies i=j$. I need to show that the only matrices which commute with $M$ are also block diagonal with the same block sizes as $M$.

My approach so far was to try and write out a general matrix $A$ in the same block form as $M$ and assume it commutes with $M$. Then compute the multiplication on the left and right and equate the blocks, with the goal of showing that all the non-diagonal blocks must be zero. I didn't make much progress with this approach.

Do you have any suggestions?

share|improve this question
1  
A special case of this (where $M$ is diagonal) appeared in a previous question. –  Jonas Meyer Feb 16 '12 at 1:12
1  
I was assuming an algebraically closed field, so we don't have the possibility of things like $M_1=\begin{bmatrix}0&-1&0\\1&0&0\\0&0&1\end{bmatrix}$, which has exactly one eigenvalue over $\mathbb R$, but would have three eigenvalues over $\mathbb C$. Is that a safe assumption? –  Jonas Meyer Feb 16 '12 at 1:26
    
The question specifies that we are working in a field $F$, so we may not assume that it is algebraically closed. However, we are given that all the eigenvalues are in $F$, so this is sufficient, correct? –  nullUser Feb 16 '12 at 1:33
    
Yes, I would take that to mean that the characteristic polynomial of $M$ factors into linear factors in $F$, which is all we need. (With that added, there's no need to assume algebraically closed.) –  Jonas Meyer Feb 16 '12 at 1:47
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Putting $A$ in block form $(A_{ij})$, commutativity means $M_iA_{ij}=A_{ij}M_j$ for all $i$ and $j$, and you want to show that $i\neq j$ implies $A_{ij}=0$. Note that $M_iA_{ij}=A_{ij}M_j$ implies $p(M_i)A_{ij}=A_{ij}p(M_j)$ for every polynomial $p$. In particular, there is an $n$ such that $(M_j-\lambda_j I)^n=0$, so $(M_i-\lambda_j I)^nA_{ij}=0$. Since $M_i-\lambda_j I$ is invertible (when $i\neq j$), this implies that $A_{ij}=0$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.