Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have some questions about Sasaki -and Sasaki-Einstein geometry. I hope, you can answer me some of these questions.

1.) Let $(M, g)$ a Riemannian manifold and $(C(M)=\mathbb{R}_{>0} \times M, \overline{g}=dr^{2}+r^{2}g)$ denote its metric

cone. In the paper "Sasaki-Einstein Manifolds" from Lames Sparks, I find that the Sasaki manifold $(M, g)$ is naturally isometrically embedded into the cone via the inclusion

\begin{equation} M=\lbrace r=1\rbrace=\lbrace1 \times M\rbrace \subset C(M). \end{equation}

How can I see this?

2.) Let $\overline{\nabla}$ the Levi-Civita connection of $\overline{g}$. Is then $\overline{\nabla}_{\partial_{r}}\partial_{r}=0$ or

$\overline{\nabla}_{\partial_{r}}\partial_{r}=\partial_{r}$ with $\partial_{r}:=\frac{\partial}{\partial r}$?

3.) How can I show, that the Lie-derivative of $J$ in direction from $r \partial_{r}$ is equal to zero?

4.) If I define $\xi=r \partial_{r}$, how can I show that $\mathcal{L}_{\xi} \overline{g}=0$, i.e. $\xi$ is a Killing vectorfield. With $\mathcal{L}$ I mean the Lie-derivative.

5.) Let $\eta=d^{c} \log r=i(\partial-\overline{\partial}) \log r$, where $\partial$ and $\overline{\partial}$ the usual Dolbeault operators. How can I show that

\begin{equation} \eta(X)=\frac{1}{r^{2}} \overline{g}(J(r\partial_{r}), X) \end{equation}

and the Kähler 2-form on $C(M)$ is $\omega=\frac{1}{2}d(r^{2}\eta)=\frac{1}{2} i \partial \overline{\partial} r^{2}$?

6.) We define $\Phi(X)$ as $\Phi(X)=\nabla_{X} \xi$. How can I show that $(\nabla_{X}\Phi) Y=g(\xi, Y)X-g(X, Y)\xi$?

7.) http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/9810/9810250v1.pdf, Proposition 1.1.2, page number 4. Can someone proof the equivalence (i) $\Leftrightarrow$ (ii)?

8.) Let $M=S^{2m+1} \cong \mathbb{C}^{m+1}$. This is a Sasaki manifold. But what is $\xi$ oder $\Phi$?

9.) Analogous: Let $M=\mathbb{R}^{2m+1}$, it is also Sasaki, but what is $\xi$ or $\Phi$?

10.) I have read the following about 3-Sasaki-manifolds. The definition of 3-Sasaki-manifolds (cone is hyperkähler) implies

$\text{Hol}(\overline{g}) \subset Sp(k) \subset SU(2k)$ and then that 3-Sasaki manifolds are also Sasaki-Einstein.

How can I prove this?

And the last question:

11.) Let $(M, g)$ a Sasaki-manifold of dimension $2m+1$. Then the following are equivalent:

i) $(M, g)$ is Sasaki with $\text{Ric}_{g}=2m \cdot g$. ii) $(C(M), \overline{g})$ is Ricci flat.

What is the sketch of proof?

Thanks a lot and best regards Ronald

share|improve this question
4  
@ Ronald Muller (with an umlaut): I don't want to nitpick, but I think you should try to ask only one or a couple of questions at the time on this website. If you break up this question, I think you have more and, most importantly, more useful answers ;). – Max Muller Nov 19 '10 at 14:10
Ah okay, thank you for the information. Then I will do so :) – Ronald Müller Nov 19 '10 at 14:37
2  
+1 to Max, and I don't think it's a nitpick. Asking $11$ questions at once is poor etiquette on most Q&A sites and in any event not a good strategy: it is very unlikely that all $11$ of your questions will get addressed. – Pete L. Clark Nov 20 '10 at 3:33
1  
FWIW, I considered voting to close this question, but none of the reasons seemed fitting. There's no choice for "please don't ask $11$ questions at once"! – Pete L. Clark Nov 20 '10 at 3:34
I will close this as not constructive, for lack of a better reason. Please Ronald —or anyone—, if you come back and are interested in asking this, resk the questions one or two at a time. – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez May 9 '12 at 6:43

closed as not constructive by mixedmath, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez May 9 '12 at 6:43

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, see the FAQ for guidance.