0
$\begingroup$

I have the following problem, where I'd like to know whether I'm doing it right and whether the notation of the joint PMF is correct.

One of two doctors, Dr. Hibbert and Dr. Nick, is called upon to perform a series of $n$ surgeries. Let $H$ be the indicator random variable for Dr. Hibbert performing the surgeries, and suppose that $E(H) = p$. Given that Dr. Hibbert is performing the surgeries, each surgery is successful with probability $a$, independently. Given that Dr. Nick is performing the surgeries, each surgery is successful with probability $b$, independently. Let $X$ be the number of successful surgeries.

(a) Find the joint PMF of H and X.

(b) Find the marginal PMF of X.

(c) Find the conditional PMF of H given X = k.

a) $$ P(X=x, H=h) = \left( \binom{n}{x} a^x(1-a)^{n-x} \cdot p \right)^{h} + \left( \binom{n}{x} b^x(1-b)^{n-x} \cdot (1-p) \right)^{1-h} $$

b) $$ P(X=x) = \sum_{h=0}^1 P(X=x, H=h) = \binom{n}{x} \left( a^x(1-a)^{n-x} \cdot p + b^x(1-b)^{n-x} \cdot (1-p) \right) $$

c) $$ P(H=1|X=x) = \frac{1}{1 + \frac{1-p}{p} (\frac{b}{a})^x (\frac{1-b}{1-a})^{n-x}} $$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What's r.v. indicator, and $I(h)$? $\endgroup$ Dec 29, 2014 at 22:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I edited it. r.v. = random variable, $I(h)$ is actually not necessary. $\endgroup$ Dec 29, 2014 at 22:09

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

a) should read: $$ P(X=x, H=h) = \binom{n}{x} \left( a^x(1-a)^{n-x} \cdot p \right)^{h} \cdot \left(b^x(1-b)^{n-x} \cdot (1-p) \right)^{1-h} $$

b) is correct: $$ P(X=x) = \sum_{h=0}^1 P(X=x, H=h) = \binom{n}{x} \left( a^x(1-a)^{n-x} \cdot p + b^x(1-b)^{n-x} \cdot (1-p) \right) $$

c) should read: $$ P(H=1|X=x) = \frac{a^x(1-a)^{n-x} \cdot p}{a^x(1-a)^{n-x} \cdot p +b^x(1-b)^{n-x} \cdot (1-p)}$$ $$ P(H=0|X=x) = \frac{b^x(1-b)^{n-x} \cdot (1-p)}{a^x(1-a)^{n-x} \cdot p +b^x(1-b)^{n-x} \cdot (1-p)}$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The reason why @Did uses multiplication instead of addition is because if $h = 0$ in the expression using addition, the first term is $1$, not zero; and when $h = 1$, the second term is $1$, not zero, and you would get a probability exceeding $1$ in either case. $\endgroup$
    – heropup
    Dec 29, 2014 at 22:39
  • $\begingroup$ @heropup Thanks (although I would not say this is the reason, rather some post hoc confirmation). $\endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 30, 2014 at 8:37

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .