Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

One can do a mapping between binary decimal numbers and integers like this:

1 -> 0.110100111
2 -> 0.101010110
3 -> 0.010001000
4 -> 0.101011111
...............

...............
n -> 0.011100010

Now with Cantor's diagonal argument we can prove that there is a decimal binary number not in the list. And thereby prove that binary numbers in decimal representation is uncountable, right?

share|improve this question

put on hold as off-topic by Andres Caicedo, This is much healthier., Hakim, Kirill, Gina 2 days ago

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – This is much healthier., Hakim, Kirill
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

3  
I don't understand the first sentence of your statement. What does "you can do a mapping between binary decimal numbers and integers" meant to be? If you are asking "Can one apply Cantor's diagonal argument to the binary decimals to show that the binary decimals are uncountable?" the answer is "yes, but you have to be a bit careful with the issue of dual representation." If the first sentence means something else... well, it depends on what your first sentence is supposed to mean. –  Arturo Magidin Feb 10 '12 at 4:06
    
binary (fractional) numbers are all part of $\mathbb{R}$ just as all decimal fractional numbers are (there is a 1-1 binding between them) –  ratchet freak Feb 10 '12 at 4:07
    
To get around the issue of double representation, work with blocks of 2 digits instead of single digits; given blocks 00, 01, or 11, select 10; given the block 10, select the block 01. This will give you a number in binary expansion with a unique expansion that is not on the given list. –  Arturo Magidin Feb 10 '12 at 4:12
3  
"binary" means base-2; "decimal" means base-10. What does "binary decimal" mean?? –  Michael Hardy Feb 10 '12 at 4:14
    
@Michael: It means I need to get some sleep, at any rate... –  Arturo Magidin Feb 10 '12 at 4:17
show 4 more comments

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Yes, you can use (a variant of) Cantor's diagonal argument to prove that the real numbers $x$ with $0\le x\lt1$, as given in binary, are uncountable. I say "a variant of" because one must exercise a little more care when the numbers are given in binary than when they are given in decimal, but it is still essentially Cantor's argument - and of course it gives the same conclusion, since the reals are the reals, whether you represent them to base 2 or to base 10 or as continued fractions or....

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.