Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $C(\mathbb{R})$ be the set of all continuous functions and $T:C(\mathbb{R})\rightarrow C(\mathbb{R})$ defined by $T(f(x))=xf(x)$. I would like to know if there are subespaces $W_{1}, W_{2}$ of $C(\mathbb{R})$ such that $T|W_{1}$ is nilpotent and $T|W_{2}$ is invertible and $T=T|W_{1}+T|W_{2}$.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

If $T$ is nilpotent on a subspace $W_1$, then there exists $n\gt 0$ such that for all $f(x)\in W_1$, we have $$T^n(f(x)) = 0;$$ since $T^n(f(x)) = x^nf(x)$, we want function $f(x)\colon\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ such that $x^nf(x) = 0$ for some $n\gt 0$ and for all $x$. What can you say about such functions? That will tell you whether $W_1$ can exist, and if so what it should be.

share|cite|improve this answer
    
Then whe have $W_{1}=\{0\}$. Am I correct this time? :) – spohreis Feb 7 '12 at 21:01
    
Yes, though it takes some argument; you need $f(a)=0$ for all $a\neq 0$; continuity then gives $f(0)=0$, so $f=0$. Thus, $W_1$ will necessarily be the zero subspace, which means that $W_2$ has to be the whole thing. Note that $xf(x)=0$ if and only if $f(x)=0$ (since $f$ must be continuous), so $T$ is already invertible, so setting $W_1=\{\mathbf{0}\}$ and $W_2=C(\mathbb{R})$ will do it (in a trivial way), and it cannot be done in any other way. – Arturo Magidin Feb 7 '12 at 21:03

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.