Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a line $L$ in the plane expressed as the points in $L = \{(x,y) \in {\mathbb{R}}^2 : x \cos \theta + y \sin \theta = r \; \wedge \; 0 > \theta > \pi/2 \}$ (note that the line cannot be fully horizontal or fully vertical). This line can possibly intersect the $y$-axis in $w-m \leq y \leq w+m$ for a fixed frame width $w > 0$ and a margin $0 \leq m << w$ (the line is generally "stuck" to a certain distance from the origin).

Let's call the point of intersection $Q$. I need to rotate line L in either direction around Q with angle $\phi$ (generally quite a small rotation; $\phi < \lvert\pi/20\rvert$). After the rotation I need to translate the line by a vector $\mathbf{t}$ perpendicular to the now rotated line. Again the distance $\lVert \mathbf{t} \rVert$ is generally small but its direction is always in the direction of the previous rotation.

Question: Was is the relationship between the original line $L$'s parameters $\theta$ and $r$ and the new rotated and translated line's parameters ${\theta}_\text{new}$ and $r_\text{new}$?

EDIT - Feb 8th 2012: Major changes. Original posing of the question was entirely wrong. The geometrical situation is now quite different and not quite as trivial as hinted at below in the comments.

share|cite|improve this question
If you realize that $\theta$ is the direction of the normal vector of the line, and $r$ is the distance from the origin to the line, I think you should find the answer quite obvious. It's a matter of simple addition. – Harald Hanche-Olsen Feb 7 '12 at 21:10
@HaraldHanche-Olsen - Thank you for the comment. Yes, I am aware of the geometrical interpretation. And I have a piece of paper filled with triangles and lines :) My current guess must be ${\theta}_D = \theta - \phi$ and $r_D = r_R - \lVert \mathbf{t} \rVert$, where $r_R$ is the distance to the rotated line (before translation). – Ole Thomsen Buus Feb 8 '12 at 8:35
May I suggest posting your solution as an actual answer instead of as an edit to your question? – J. M. Feb 8 '12 at 13:13
@J.M. : Oh yes. I will do that. – Ole Thomsen Buus Feb 8 '12 at 15:49

2 Answers 2

up vote 0 down vote accepted

After some fidling around with triangles and trigonometry I found the solution myself:

  • ${\theta}_\text{new} = \theta \pm \phi$,
  • $r_\text{new} = r \cos \phi [1 \pm (\tan \phi / \tan \theta)] \pm \lVert \mathbf{t} \rVert$.

Not trivial but also not very dificult. Seems to be working beautifully in Mathematica.

share|cite|improve this answer

lets' go the following graph of a line: General equation of a line is: Y= mx +b where m= the slope of the line and -b = the x intercept of the line. How how ever your question is not complete, in the sense that, the axes of rotation of the line is not mention. if it is rotated around it self it will remain the same line withe same slope and x intercept. But if it is rotated around the x axis it will generate two cones whose vertexes are joined at the same point. and so on. But if it is translated to another point in the plane for example (n,p) as its new origin then coordinate of all points with respect to the original axes are: new x= x-n and new y=y-p

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks - but this was already solved two years ago :-) – Ole Thomsen Buus Feb 10 at 18:33

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.