Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $\epsilon_1,\ldots,\epsilon_m$ be Bernoulli random variables, i.e. $P(\epsilon_i=1)=P(\epsilon_i=-1)=\frac 12$.

I wanted to calculate (or at least approximate) the following conditional expectation: $$ E\left(\epsilon^{n_1}_1 \cdots \epsilon^{n_m}_m |\sum_{i=1}^m \epsilon_i=0 \right) $$ Here $n_1+\cdots+n_m=n$, $n\in N$ and $n_j \in \{0,1,\ldots,n\}$.

Since we have condition that $\sum_{i=1}^m \epsilon_i=0$, then we can say that $m=2k$ is even.

Now, I rearrange random variables: $(\epsilon^{n_1}_1\cdots\epsilon^{n_k}_k) \left(\epsilon^{n_{k+1}}_{k+1}\cdots\epsilon^{n_2k}_{2k}\right)$ so that first $k$ of them are 1 and second $k$ of them are $-1$. Thus, $$ E\left[\left(\epsilon^{n_1}_1\cdots\epsilon^{n_k}_k\right) \left(\epsilon^{n_{k+1}}_{k+1}\cdots \epsilon^{n_2k}_{2k}\right)\right]=E\left[(-1)^{\sum_{j=k+1}^{2k}n_j}\right]. $$

And here I am stuck...

share|improve this question
    
an $n_j$ went missing in the final summation! –  user21436 Feb 7 '12 at 3:18
    
BTW, what is inside the expectation operator looks like a constant to me. So, expectation will be the same constant. Or, likely that I don't understand what's going on? So, let me ask you. expectations are calculated for random variables, what is the random variable in question? –  user21436 Feb 7 '12 at 3:21
    
Thank you. Yes, expectation calculated for the Bernoulli random variables. Since I have assumption that their sum is 0, then the variables are not independent any more. So, I cannot use the fact for independent r.v. that expectation of product is the product of expectations. –  David Feb 7 '12 at 3:47
    
@Robert Israel: I am sorry. I did my rown way. Eventually, I gess its the same as you suggested, but I did not understand your logic. Could you please show me your way. –  David Feb 8 '12 at 4:34
    
I get pinged every time you ping Robert, I guess, it is because of the space between Robert and Israel. So, please ping him below his answer. I am sure he'll help you out if he's around! –  user21436 Feb 8 '12 at 4:36

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

First of all, these are not really Bernoulli random variables, since those take the values $0$ and $1$, not $-1$ and $1$. Rather, it's $(\epsilon_i + 1)/2$ that are Bernoulli.
And you do need to assume that $\epsilon_i$ are independent (before you condition on the sum).

Of course $\epsilon_i^{n_i} = 1$ if $n_i$ is even and $\epsilon_i$ if $n_i$ is odd. So if $S = \{i: n_i \text{ is odd}\}$, you're asking for $E\left[\epsilon_S | \sum_{i=1}^m \epsilon_i = 0\right]$, where $\epsilon_S = \prod_{i \in S} \epsilon_i$. Let $T = \{i: \epsilon_i = -1\}$. If $\sum_{i=1}^m \epsilon_i = 0$, $T$ has cardinality $m/2$, and all $m \choose {m/2}$ subsets of that cardinality are equally likely to be $T$. Now given $T$, $\epsilon_S = 1$ if and only if $|S \cap T|$ is even, $-1$ if it is odd. Well, that should be enough hints for a homework problem.

share|improve this answer
    
I am sorry for smoll symbols. Here what I've got: I am using definition of conditional expectation through conditional probability. Probability $P=P\left(\epsilon^{n_1}_1...\epsilon^{n_m}_m| \sum_{i=1}^m\epsilon_i\right)={\frac{1}{2^{m/2}}}1/({{m \choose m/2}\frac{1}{2^{m/2}}})$. Now, $E\left(\epsilon^{n_1}_1...\epsilon^{n_m}_m| \sum_{i=1}^m\epsilon_i\right)=P\sum_{\{\epsilon_i,..., \epsilon_m\}: \sum_i\epsilon_i=0}\prod_{i=1}^m\epsilon^{n_i}_i=1/(2^{m/2}{m \choose m/2})\sum_{\{A \subset \{1,..,m\}, card(A)=m/2}\}(-1)^{\sum_{i\in A}n_i}$ –  David Feb 8 '12 at 4:34

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.