Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm currently reading through Gohberg and Goldberg's treatment of Sturm-Liouville systems in Basic Operator Theory.

Define a Sturm-Liouville system to be a differential equation of the form $$\frac{d}{dx}(p(x) \frac{dy}{dx}) + q(x) y = f(x)$$ with boundary conditions $$a_1 y(a) + a_2 y'(a) = 0$$ $$b_1 y(b) + b_2 y'(b) = 0$$ where $a_i, b_i$ are real numbers with $a_1^2 + a_2^2 \neq 0$, $b_1^2 + b_2^2 \neq 0$. Suppose the only solution where $f = 0$ is $y=0$. Then there exist real valued nonzero functions $y_1, y_2$ that are solutions, such that $y_1$ satisfies the first boundary condition and $y_2$ the second. Then they claim that a "straightforward computation" verifies that $(pW)' = 0$, where $W$ denotes the Wronskian. I do not see this computation. What I end up with is $$(pW)' = p'y_1 y_2' - p' y_2 y_1' + py_1' y_2' + py_1 y_2'' - py_2' y_1' - py_2 y_1''$$ and I don't see why it's zero.

share|cite|improve this question

Wrewrite $(p\,W)'$ as $$(p\,W)'=y_1(p\,y_2')'-y_2(p\,y_1')' $$ and use the fact that $y_1$ and $y_2$ are solutions of the equation.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.