Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If we consider the group of automorphisms of an orientable surface, then the subgroup that contains the orientation-preserving automorphisms will be of index two. Why is that?

Any explanation will be appreciated.

Thank you.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

If $S$ is connected and you have chosen an orientation , you get an orientation morphism $$or:Aut(S)\to Or(S)=\lbrace +1,-1\rbrace$$ If you know that $S$ admits of an orientation reversing automorphism (this is the key point!), that morphism will be surjective and you can conclude thanks to the exact sequence of groups
$$1\to Aut^+(S) \to Aut(S)\to\lbrace +1,-1\rbrace \to 1 $$

share|cite|improve this answer
Very clear! Thanks. – yaa09d Feb 3 '12 at 2:01

I'm assuming by "surface" you mean a (real?) manifold.

Anyway, let $G\cong \text{Aut}(S)$ be the group automorphisms on your surface $S$. Let $H$ be the subgroup of orientation preserving automorphisms (you should show actually show that this is indeed a [normal] subgroup).

The order of the quotient group $G/H$ is the index of $H$ in $G$ and consists of elements of the form $\{\overline{\text{id}_H},\bar{\phi} \}$ where $\bar{\phi}$ is the equivalence class of orientation reversing automorphisms of $S$. (Note: the identity map $\text{id}_H$ is orientation preserving.)

The product $\bar{\phi}\cdot\bar{\phi}$ is the coset of the automorphism $\phi\circ\phi$, which has to be orientation preserving since [on any suiably chosen neighborhood of $S$] $\text{det}(\phi\circ\phi)=\text{det}(\phi)\text{det}(\phi)=(-1)(-1)=1$. So the quotient $G/H$ is indeed of order 2, hence the index of $H$ is 2.

I've been a bit lax about neighborhoods and charts (assuming we're talking about manifolds) and this is something you should work out, but what I've said is more or less the idea of what's going on.

Hope that helps.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for your help! – yaa09d Feb 3 '12 at 2:02

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.