Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose $f:R^n\to R$ is both convex and concave, how to prove that $f$ is linear? or exactly speaking, $f$ is affine?

I thought for the whole day, but I cannot figure it out.

When I was working on this problem, I met another problem, are all the convex function continuous?If not, is there any counter example?

Actually, I can prove for one dimensional case, in which $f:R\to R$. However, I cannot generalize it into n dimensional cases.

By the way, I use definition for convex(concave) like this: $$f(t\vec{x}+(1-t)\vec{y})\leq(or \geq)tf(\vec{x})+(1-t)f(\vec{y}), \forall t\in[0,1].$$

Thank you so much!

share|cite|improve this question

Let $g(x) = f(x) - f(0)$. It suffices to show that $g$ (which is also both convex and concave, and satisfies $g(0)=0$) is linear. Next, note that for $t > 1$, $x = (1/t) (tx) + (1 - 1/t) (0)$.

That should give you a good start...

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you so much! That helps a lot! – breezeintopl Feb 2 '12 at 5:25
I'm done! Thank you sooooooo much! – breezeintopl Feb 2 '12 at 6:05
@breezeintopl, Remember to accept Robert Israel's answer as the solution. – Samuel Reid Feb 2 '12 at 6:36
@breezeintopl Click the green checkmark near the voting controls. – Glen Wheeler Mar 23 '12 at 9:06

First off.... When I was working on this problem, I met another problem, are all the convex function continuous?If not, is there any counter example?

It is a requirement that all convex functions MUST be continuous, this is because the epigraph of a convex function is a convex set; but a discontinuity (of any type) would obviously preclude the epigraph of a function from being convex and hence the function which induces the epigraph could not be convex. I realize "obviously" is something people don't generally want to hear, but I feel like considering the epigraph isn't obvious but once you do the required implications are obvious.


Concerning that $f(x)$ is affine is equally trivial if you consider the epigraph and a simple geometric argument. $f(x)$ is concave iff $-f(x)$ is convex iff the epigraph of $-f(x)$ is convex. But then the epigraph of $f(x)$ must be convex AND the subgraph of $f(x)$ must be convex, hence the graph must be traced by an affine function.

Note: The epigraph is the set of points on a plot above the graph and the subgraph is the set of points on a plot below the graph.

share|cite|improve this answer
Convex functions are continuous. For a proof see Rudin Real and Complex chapter three. Whoops - sorry, didn't read past the first line. PS it is obvious but is tricky to write down. – AreaMan Nov 28 '13 at 8:46
Not sure how this comment is constructive? – Squirtle Nov 29 '13 at 5:01
I'm not sure how your comment is constructive, but you can have some points anyway. If it is necessary to defend the sanctity of my comment I can say that have provided a reference where the curious can find another proof of the implication convex -> continuous. – AreaMan Nov 29 '13 at 5:06

Whether convexity implies continuity depends on the domain (are you on a bounded domain or all of $\mathbb{R}^n$?). Consider, e.g., a smiling frog; the graph of the function is the smile, but at the end points of the smile, it is the eyes. That's a convex but not continuous function.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.