Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $x$ depend on $t$. $\dot{x}$ is derivative $x$ over $t$. I want to calculate the integral $\int \dot{x} \; dx$. I asked similar question about differentiation here. Any thoughts and ideas are appreciated. Thank you!

share|cite|improve this question
The case $\int \dot x dt$ is easier. – Jon Feb 1 '12 at 16:55
well, $\int \dot{x} dx = \int \dot{x}^2 dt$ – ashim Feb 1 '12 at 17:06
According to W.A. this integral has no solution in terms of elementary functions... – pedja Feb 1 '12 at 17:09
@pedja: That was I meant. – Jon Feb 1 '12 at 17:14
@MichaelHardy capuloca's comment is saying that a sum of infinitesimal ratios $\frac{dx}{dt}\cdot dx$ is the same as a sum of infinitesimal ratios $\frac{dx}{dt}\frac{dx}{dt}\cdot dt$. And it is helpful for calculation if you have $x$ explictly in terms of $t$. – alex.jordan Feb 1 '12 at 22:16
up vote 7 down vote accepted

The integral $\int \dot x dx$ cannot be evaluated explicitely unless the form of the function $x(t)$ is also given. This can be easily understood in the following way

$$\int \dot x dx=\int (\dot x)^2 dt$$

that cannot be furtherly explicited. This kind of computations generally come out from studies on mechanics with dissipative systems. If you have a differential equation like

$$\ddot x=-\dot x+F(x)$$

you can multiply both sides by $\dot x$ and integrating obtain

$$\int dt \frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{{\dot x}^2}{2}\right)-\int dx F(x)=-\int \dot x dx$$

that cannot be reduced anymore even if lhs can be expressed through an energy integral.

share|cite|improve this answer
can you explain more about the last equation, plz. Why from that you conclude that there is no solution? Thanks – ashim Feb 2 '12 at 3:18
@capoluca: I am not implying that there is no solution but that, in order to evaluate your integral, you will need to know $x(t)$ explicitly, solving the original ode. In this way you are able to evaluate the integral on the rhs that is your problem. – Jon Feb 2 '12 at 7:35

You can write it as $\int \frac{dx}{dt}dx$ which, assuming appropriate smoothness conditions on $\dot{x}$ is the same as $\frac{d}{dt}\int x dx = \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{x^2}{2} + C) = x\dot{x}$

share|cite|improve this answer
could explain details plz, why can we put derivation over t outside of the integral? and by the way you don't have constant in the answer, however, you should have one. – ashim Feb 1 '12 at 16:57
Moreover, if you take derivative of your answer you would not get $\dot{x}$ – ashim Feb 1 '12 at 17:01
Can someone down vote this answer, it is wrong – ashim Feb 1 '12 at 17:19

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.