Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

For $x > 1$, the geometric series $\sum\limits_{i = 0}^n{x}^i$ is equal to $\frac{x^{n+1}-1}{x-1}$.

By getting the limit,

$$ \lim\limits_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum\limits_{i = 0}^n{x}^i = \lim\limits_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{x^{n+1}-1}{x-1} $$

$$ = \infty $$

However, the generating function $\sum\limits_{n \geq 0}x^n$ is equal to $\frac{1}{1-x}$ since

$$ \sum\limits_{n \geq 0}{x}^n - x\sum\limits_{n \geq 0}{x}^n= (1 + x + x^2 + x^3 + \dots) - (x + x^2 + x^3 + \dots) = 1 $$

$$ \Rightarrow (1-x)\sum\limits_{n \geq 0}{x}^n= 1 $$

$$ \Rightarrow \sum\limits_{n \geq 0}{x}^n= \frac{1}{1-x} $$

Obviously, $\frac{1}{1-x}$ is a finite number.

What is the underlying concept that makes them yield different results?

share|cite|improve this question
A "generating function" need not be a function in the usual sense. – André Nicolas Feb 1 '12 at 14:49
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Although this is not the intended interpretation, one could also make sense of the identity $$ \sum_{n \geq 0} x^n = (1-x)^{-1} \tag{$\dagger$} $$ formally; i.e., in the ring of formal power series $\mathbf C[[x]]$. The user Bill Dubuque explains the idea in several posts in this site; see, e.g., his answer to the post Product of two power series.

The advantage in interpreting $(\dagger)$ formally is that since $x$ is an indeterminate rather than a number, there are no longer any convergence issues. In this sense, the series $\sum_{n \geq 0} x^n$ is the same as the finite thing $(1-x)^{-1}$.

The flip side of this is that one can no longer plug in values into the series: it does not make sense to talk about the sum of the series at $x = \frac{1}{2}$. Thus the statement "the series converges for $|x| < 1$ and diverges otherwise" is meaningless under this interpretation.

share|cite|improve this answer
(I am fully aware that there is a chance the OP may not understand the answer. This post is meant for all readers, not just the OP.) – Srivatsan Feb 1 '12 at 16:47

They're not different. The generating function is only defined for when $|x| < 1$. Similarly, the geometric series only converges for $|x| < 1$. And in that case, $\lim x^n = 0$ and you see that the two expressions are the same.

share|cite|improve this answer

The given derivation of the fact that $\sum_{ n \geq 0 } x^n = \frac{ 1 }{ 1 - x }$, doesn't address convergence of the intermediate series at all. You can't ignore this issue in a derivation and then hope to plug in numbers to the result.

The derivation given shows that the given identity is valid in the context of formal power series, which are important in the study of generating functions.

As @mixedmath correctly states, you may only substitute numbers into this identity if $| x | < 1$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.