Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've had this matrix on a test some time ago:

$$ \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0\\ -4& 4 & 0\\ -2& 1 & 2 \end{bmatrix} $$

It's eigenvalues are $\ \lambda _1= \lambda _2= \lambda _3=2$.

In my case, that got me the eigenvectors of: $\ v_1(0,0,0), v_2 (0,0,1), v_3 (1,2,0)$. I got the $v_3$ by using standard $(A- \lambda I)X=0$ system, but I had to guess the other two. In his case, it was easy, since in the system of equations, the $x_3$ never shows up, but I want to know if there is some formal way to determine the other vectors in a situation such as this one.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The $(A-\lambda I)X=0$ equation should give all the solutions. You simply obtain a solution space of dimension greater than 1. So your question is basically how to find solution spaces to linear equation systems.

To do this, you need to obtain the Canonical Echelon form of the matrix. In our case it has only zeroes except in the upper row which is $(1, \frac{1}{2}, 0)$. Now, the variables corresponding to the first "1" in every row of the Echelon matrix is a "bound" variable; the remaining variables are free. To obtain solutions which are not dependent, simply substitute 1 in one free variable and 0 in the others and see what you get for each such substitution.

In our case, if the variables are $x,y,z$ we have $x+\frac{1}{2}y+0\cdot z=0$, so $x$ is bound and $y,z$ are free. For $y=1, z=0$ we get $x=-\frac{1}{2}$, (so the solution we get is $(\frac{1}{2},1,0)$ which is the same as $(1,2,0)$ and for $y=0, z=1$ we get $x=0$ so the solution is $(0,0,1)$.

Note that $(0,0,0)$ is a trivial solution and not considered eigenvector; in our case the eigenspace of $\lambda = 2$ is of dimension 2, so we are done (the matrix is not diagonizable).

share|improve this answer
    
Can you explain Canonical Echelon form of the matrix? I'm not sure how to translate that and Google and Wikipedia are being unhelpful. –  AndrejaKo Feb 1 '12 at 10:24
    
    
Obtaining this matrix (Gauss–Jordan elimination) is the first (and most important) algorithm learned in Linear Algebra. –  Gadi A Feb 1 '12 at 10:31
    
Which one on that link? The first or the second? –  AndrejaKo Feb 1 '12 at 10:32
    
I most likely do know how to obtain it, but the term Canonical Echelon form of the matrix doesn't appear anywhere where I searched. Here where I am, we use different language (which in not English) and I'm having problems understanding is the Canonical Echelon form of the matrix is row echelon form or reduced row echelon form. –  AndrejaKo Feb 1 '12 at 10:39
show 3 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.