Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider the following figure, with $|\text{AD}|=|\text{CE}|$.

If $|\text{AB}|=|\text{CB}|$, then $\text{AC}$ is parallell to $\text{DE}$ and $|\text{DE}|=\frac{|\text{AB}|}{|\text{AD}|}|\text{AC}|\le |AC|$, by the Intercept Theorem.

If we don't suppose anything, it seems true that we still always have $|\text{DE}|\le |\text{AC}|$. Does this result have a name ? How might it be proved ?

share|improve this question
1  
Here is a quick intuitive argument that $|DE|<|AC|$. This certainly holds at least sometimes! If we can get to $|DE|> |AC|$, then on the way we can get to $|DE|=|AC|$. But then $ACDE$ is a parallelogram, so the angles at $A$ and $C$ add up to $180^\circ$, ridiculous. –  André Nicolas Jan 30 '12 at 22:56

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Here's an elementary geometry proof. The left picture is the quadrilateral of relevance in your picture. You want to show that given that $AD\cong CE$ and $\angle DAC+\angle ECA<180^\circ$ (since they are two of the three angles of $\triangle ABC$), we have $DE<AC$.

enter image description here

Since $\angle DAC+\angle ECA<180^\circ$, we can construct exterior to the quadrilateral $ACDE$ a segment $AF$ (in red) such that $AF$ is congruent and parallel to $CE$. Now ACEF is a parallelogram since it has one pair of congruent and parallel opposite sides, so $AC\cong FE$, and it suffices to show that $DE<FE$. Consider the triangle $\triangle DEF$ (in blue). Since the angle opposite the greater side is greater, it suffices to show that $\angle FDE>\angle DFE$. But this is easy since $$ {\small \angle FDE=\angle FDA+\angle ADE=\angle AFD+\angle ADE=(\angle AFE+\angle DFE)+\angle ADE,} $$ which is clearly greater than $\angle DFE$, as desired. (Note that in the second step, we used that $\angle FDA=\angle AFD$ since $\triangle ADF$ is isosceles.)

share|improve this answer

(This feels like cracking walnuts with a sledgehammer...) From the Law of Cosines applied about $\angle B$ to find the lengths $DE$ and $AC$ in terms of $AB$, $CB$, and $d=AD=CE$ (using Mathematica), $DE\le AC\Leftrightarrow$ $$(AB+CB-d)d(\cos B-1)\le 0.$$

Since $d>0$, $d<AB$, and $d<CB$, the first two terms in the product are positive. $\cos B\le 1$, so $\cos B-1\le 0$, so the inequality is true.

share|improve this answer
    
Yeah, I hoped to find an elementary proof before getting to this extent ;) I didn't know you could use Mathematica to do that kind of formal manipulation, it must be very helpful and time-saving! –  Klaus Jan 30 '12 at 23:17
    
@Klaus: I'm still thinking about it and hoping for a more geometric proof... this didn't feel as bad as cracking walnuts with a steamroller (that would probably have been a proof with coordinates), but it didn't feel elegant. Using Mathematica meant that I could type in the raw formulas from the Law of Cosines with the appropriate inequality symbol between them, tell it to simplify, and get the expression I put in my answer as the result, rather than having to do the algebraic work myself. –  Isaac Jan 30 '12 at 23:19
    
A dream comes true, I'll definitely have to learn that! Thanks for the idea. –  Klaus Jan 30 '12 at 23:21

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.