Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know that the property $\langle u, v \rangle = \overline{\langle v, u \rangle}$ for inner product holds.

I have a matrix $A$, such that,

$\langle Ax, x \rangle = -\langle x, Ax \rangle$ i.e.

$\langle x, Ax \rangle = -\overline{\langle x, Ax \rangle}$.

What does this imply about $Ax$ and $x$?

I need to show that $\langle Ax, x \rangle = 0$, which is actually valid for any $A = -A^T$, which I verified using sample matrices, but cannot verify in general. Can anyone help?


share|cite|improve this question

Let $E=\{e_i:i=\overline{1,n}\}$ be orthonormal basis of vector space $V$ over $\mathbb{C}$. Consider linear operator $A\in\mathcal{L}(V,V)$ such that $\langle Ax, x\rangle=-\langle x, Ax\rangle=-\overline{\langle Ax, x\rangle}$. Let $[a_{ij}]\in\mathbb{Mat}(\mathbb{C}^n)$ be the matrix of operator $A$ in basis $E$, then $a_{ij}=\langle Ae_i, e_j\rangle$, and $a_{ij}=-\overline{a_{ij}}$. For complex numbers the equality $z=-\overline{z}$ implies $z=0$, so $a_{ij}=0$ for all $i,j$. Since the matrix $[a_{ij}]=0$, then $A=0$.

share|cite|improve this answer
actually, my requirements is that A not be 0. – rookieRailer Jan 30 '12 at 23:58
From my proof you see that this is impossible: $\langle Ax,x\rangle=-\overline{\langle Ax,x\rangle}$ implies $A=0$. – Norbert Feb 1 '12 at 9:35

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.