Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have an expression of the form:

$$\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}\exp \left\{ \frac{-1}{2\sigma^2} (x-\mu)^2 \right\} dx = \sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}$$

and I need to take its derivative with respect to $\sigma^2$. The right hand side seems easy enough:

$$\frac{\partial}{\partial\sigma^2}{(2\pi\sigma^2)}^{\frac{1}{2}} = \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{2\pi}(\sigma^2)^{\frac{-1}{2}},$$

right? What about the left hand side? I don't know how to take the derivative of something that's inside an integral -- can someone please help? I'm more interested in understanding how it would work then just the answer itself.

EDIT: corrected RHS.


Through applying the chain rule, the LHS becomes:

$$\int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{1}{2}(x-\mu)^2\frac{1}{\sigma^4} \exp{\lbrace \frac{-1}{2\sigma^2} (x-\mu)^2 \rbrace } dx $$

Does this look right? I'm unsure of how to handle the derivative of a function w.r.t to a squared variable (e.g. $\frac{\partial}{\partial\sigma^2}$ as opposed to $\frac{\partial}{\partial\alpha}$). For example, is this true: $\frac{\partial}{\partial\sigma^2} \sigma^{-2} = -\sigma^{-4}$ ?

share|cite|improve this question
RHS is still not correct. You forgot to take the $1/2$ down from the exponent into the front (the power rule is $(x^n)'=nx^{n-1}$ in case you forgot). Additionally, $2\pi$ isn't part of the variable so it doesn't go under the negative exponent; it stays as-is. – anon Jan 30 '12 at 10:30
Thank you. It's been a long time since I've had to do any calculus... – misha Jan 30 '12 at 10:45
You omitted a minus sign in the argument of the exponential. – John Bentin Jan 30 '12 at 11:44
up vote 2 down vote accepted

First off, the derivative you do have is incorrect. Where'd you get the extra $\pi$? Use the power rule:


Now to take the derivative of the integral expression you simply put the differential operator inside:


One can justify this by putting the integral into the limit definition of the partial derivative and then using the linearity of integration to pull the quotient inside the $\int$. To evaluate from here you need to use the chain rule, power rule, and know the derivative of the exponential function. Good luck...

share|cite|improve this answer
thank you for clarifying this point. I've updated my question to include my answer for the integral. Could you please let me know if it is correct? – misha Jan 30 '12 at 13:21

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.