Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X$ be a noetherian scheme and $(F_n)_{\in \mathbb N}$ an inverse system (indexed by the natural numbers) of locally sheaves of finite rank on $X$ (the ranks may vary). The transition maps $F_{n+1} \rightarrow F_n$ shall be surjective for all $n$.

Then is there a canonical isomorphism

$\mathcal Hom_{\mathcal O_X} (\varprojlim F_n, \mathcal O_X) \simeq \varinjlim \mathcal Hom_{\mathcal O_X}(F_n,\mathcal O_X)$?

Here always Sheaf-Homs are meant, and the limits are at first considered in the category of quasi-coherent modules (where they exist in any case).

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Let $A$ be a commutative noetherian ring. Let $I\subseteq A$ be an ideal. Assume $A$ is $I$-adically complete.

Let $A_n = A/I^n$. Clearly, $A_n$ is an inverse system, and $A = \varprojlim A_n$.


$\operatorname{Hom}_A(\varprojlim A_n ,A) = A $.


$\varinjlim \operatorname{Hom}_A(A_n,A) = \Gamma_I A = \{a\in A : \exists n, I^n a = 0\}$.

In particular, if $A$ is not $I$-torsion, these two are different. For a concrete example, take $A = k[[x]]$, and $I=(x)$.

Edit: this is false, I ignored your assumption about the $F_n$ being projective.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.