Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is most likely a lack of understanding of wording on my part. I was considerind the Klein 4-group as the set of four permutations: the identity permutation, and three other permutations of four elements, where each of those is made up of two transposes, (i.e., 1 $\rightarrow$ 2, 2 $\rightarrow$ 1 and 3 $\rightarrow$ 4, 4 $\rightarrow$ 3) taken over the three possible such combinations of four elements.

Here, then, is my question. I am assuming (?) that Aut(G) in this case is the set of permutations of the four elements of the Klein 4-group - or the three non-identity ones for the purpose of showing isomorphic to $S_3$. If this is the case, what does it mean to have a permutation of these three permutations that I mentioned above? As always, thanks for your help.

share|improve this question
    
I don't understand the question. What do you mean by "what does it mean to have a permutation of these three permutations"? –  Qiaochu Yuan Jan 28 '12 at 21:13
3  
Call the three non-identity elements $x, y, z$. Then a permutation is just a permutation of the set containing $x,y,z$. Perhaps you are confused because $x,y,z$ can themselves be written as permutations, but one ignores the detailed structure of $x,y,z$ and just treats them as items that can be permuted. –  Gerry Myerson Jan 28 '12 at 22:07
    
@GerryMyersonThanks. That's actually my question. Using the description of {1,2,3,4} and the permutations as I mentioned, what explicitly happens to "1" for example if you call 1 $\rightarrow$ 2 etc. $x$ and call 1 $\rightarrow$ 3, etc. $y$ and you send $x$ to $y$? –  Andrew Jan 28 '12 at 22:16
    
@QiaochuYuanI mentioned in the comment to Gerry what I am trying to articulate. If you have these permutations representing the Klein 4-group, What happens to them as you permute the permutations amongst themselves. –  Andrew Jan 28 '12 at 22:20

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Every group is a set (together with a binary operation on the set). Every automorphism of a group $G$ is a bijective function from the underlying set of $G$ to itself (which in addition respects the operation of $G$). So every automorphism of a group $G$ can be viewed as a subgroup of the group of all permutations on the underlying set of $G$; in fact, since an automorphism must send the identity of $G$ to itself, you can even view every automorphism of $G$ as a permutation of the set $G-\{e\}$.

Here you are getting a bit confused because you are viewing your group $G$ as a subgroup of $S_4$ (nothing wrong with that), and then you are trying to understand $\mathrm{Aut}(G)$ (which can be viewed as a subgroup of $S_{G-{e}} \cong S_3$) as acting on the set $\{1,2,3,4\}$ as well. While some automorphisms can be defined in terms of an action on $\{1,2,3,4\}$, not every automorphism can.

If you view $G$ as the set $\{\mathrm{id}, (1\;2), (3\;4), (1\;2)(3\;4)\}$, then letting $$\begin{align*} x &= (1\;2),\\ y &= (3\;4),\\ z &= (1\;2)(3\;4)\\ e &= \mathrm{id} \end{align*}$$ then the automorphisms of $G$ will always map $e$ to itself, and so you can view the automorphisms as being elements of $S_{\{x,y,z\}}$, the permutation group of $\{x,y,z\}$. The elements of the automorphism group are then (written in 2-line format): $$\begin{align*} \mathrm{id}_{\{x,y,z\}} &= \left(\begin{array}{ccc} x & y & z\\ x & y & z \end{array}\right)\\ f_1 &= \left(\begin{array}{ccc} x & y & z\\ y & z & x \end{array}\right)\\ f_2 &=\left(\begin{array}{ccc} x & y & z\\ z & x & y \end{array}\right)\\ f_3 &= \left(\begin{array}{ccc} x & y & z\\ y & x & z \end{array}\right)\\ f_4 &= \left(\begin{array}{ccc} x & y & z\\ z & y & x \end{array}\right)\\ f_5 &= \left(\begin{array}{ccc} x & y & z\\ x & z & y \end{array}\right) \end{align*}$$ and you can verify that each of them is an automorphism; since every automorphism corresponds to a unique element of $S_{\{x,y,z\}}$, and every element of this group is an automorphism, then this is the automorphism group.

However, you are trying to view your group $G$ as a subgroup of $S_4$. Can the automorphisms of $S_4$ be "induced" by some permutation of $\{1,2,3,4\}$? Equivalently:

If we view the Klein $4$-group $G$ as the subgroup of $S_4$ generated by $(1\;2)$ and $(3\;4)$, is every automorphism of $G$ induced by conjugation by an element of $S_4$?

Well, it doesn't. The reason it doesn't is that $x$, $y$, and $z$ don't all have the same cycle structure: conjugation by elements of $S_4$ (or more precisely, by elements of the normalizer of $G$ in $S_4$) will necessarily map $z$ to itself, because $z$ is the only element with its cycle structure (product of two disjoint transpositions) in $G$. So the only automorphisms that can be viewed as coming from "acting on ${1,2,3,4}$" are the identity and $f_3$

Added: However: it is possible to view the Klein $4$-group as a different subgroup of $S_4$: identify $x\mapsto (1\;2)(3\;4)$; $y\mapsto (1\;3)(2\;4)$, $z\mapsto (1\;4)(2\;3)$. It is not hard to verify that this is a subgroup of order $4$, and since it has three elements of order $2$, it is isomorphic to the Klein $4$-group. Now you can indeed realize every automorphism of $G$ via conjugation by an element of $S_4$ (in several different ways). Here's one way: the automorphism $\mathrm{id}$ can be realized as conjugation by the identity. The automorphism $f_1$ is given by conjugation by $(2\;3\;4)$; $f_2$ is given by conjugation by $(2\;4\;3)$; the automorphism $f_3$ is given by conjugation by $(2\;3)$; $f_4$ is given by conjugation by $(2\;4)$; and $f_5$ is given by conjugation by $(3\;4)$. You can now easily see that the automorphism group is indeed isomorphic to $S_3$, since it corresponds precisely to the subgroup of $S_4$ that fixes $1$ (you can take any of the other four one-point stabilizers as well).

share|improve this answer
    
@ArturoMagidinThanks. And congratulations for passing the 100k milestone. In addition to giving great answers, you always seem to have the insight/patience to write at the level of the questioner. –  Andrew Jan 28 '12 at 22:56
    
@Andrew: I just added something you might find closer to what you were thinking about. And thanks. –  Arturo Magidin Jan 28 '12 at 23:04
    
@ArturoMagidinThanks again. That was what I had a problem with - as I was starting with the x,y,z you just added but then couldn't see what to do with them to get the automorphisms. –  Andrew Jan 28 '12 at 23:59

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.