Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there a more modern text that someone could suggest that covers roughly the same material as does Whitney's Geometric Integration Theory? There are a number of topics in this text that I haven't seen treated elsewhere.

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

There is also Federer's book; here is its amazon page. You may also be interested in Frank Morgan's book on the subject. These lecture notes might also interest you.

share|improve this answer
    
I did not know about the book by Federer; the chapter on homological integration looks pretty interesting. –  ItsNotObvious Jan 29 '12 at 3:02

I don't think there is another book which covers all the same topics. I am only really familiar with a small portion of the book concerning the approximation of smooth manifolds with simplicial complexes. As far as I am aware, there is no other book that compares as a resource on this topic. Munkres's 'Elementary differential topology' is very good for this also, but it is hardly a more modern treatment.

I think the book by Bott and Tu "Differential forms in algebraic topology" would be an example of a more modern treatment of much of the material in the first half of Whitney's book.

I don't think there is a modern "branch" of mathematics into which Whitney's book would comfortably sit. There is geometric measure theory, and there is a book by Krantz that even has the same title as Whitney's book, which I guess you've come across if you googled that, but this has quite a different flavour from Whitney's book. It is not the same topic really, even if the same words do well to describe both.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.