Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was just wondering why we don't define the tangent space of a smooth manifold at a point $p$ to be $\{p\} \times \mathbb{R}^{n}$, rather than using derivations, germs, or equivalence classes of curves? I just started learning the material, so maybe I should just keep on reading...

share|cite|improve this question
Among other things, that definition doesn't allow you to correctly describe the relationship between the tangent spaces of two nearby points (see…). I also have no idea how you would give a coordinate-free definition of the derivative of a smooth map at a point this way. – Qiaochu Yuan Jan 26 '12 at 23:06
Even for embedded manifolds in some $\mathbb{R}^m$, if we did, then any smooth manifolds would be parallelizable, i.e. the tangent bundle $TM = M \times \mathbb{R}^n$, which is false. You can take $M=S^2.$ See – Ehsan M. Kermani Jan 26 '12 at 23:09

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.