Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

$$ \frac{\sqrt{4 + \arccos\left|\frac{2-x}{x+3}\right|}}{\sqrt{x^2 - 4x + 5} - 3} $$ I'm trying to find the natural domain of the function above. I set up this conditions:
$$ \begin{cases}\sqrt{x^2 - 4x + 5} - 3\neq0&(denominator)\\x^2 - 4x + 5\ge0&(root)\\4 + \arccos\left|\frac{2-x}{x+3}\right|\ge0&(root)\\\left|\frac{2-x}{x+3}\right|\ge-1\cup\left|\frac{2-x}{x+3}\right|\le1&(arccos)\end{cases} $$
Now I know that is necessary to set up two more conditions: the existence condition of the absolute value, and the existence condition of the fraction denominator. But I don't know how to deal with absolute values. Could someone explain it to me maybe using this example?

Note: These are not homework, but an exercise chose, because has an absolute value inside, to understand the theory.

share|improve this question
1  
The last condition should be really a intersection. –  user21436 Jan 26 '12 at 19:09
    
I am not sure if calculus tag is right. –  Aryabhata Jan 26 '12 at 19:10
    
I think Calculus tag is alright because, this is the first time, functions are learnt for their own sake. Domain and range problems are one of the first ones that a Calculus student faces! –  user21436 Jan 26 '12 at 19:30
    
@KannappanSampath: Domain and range is pre-calculus, isn't it? Anyway, I won't argue too much about it :-) –  Aryabhata Jan 26 '12 at 19:34

2 Answers 2

Given any real number $a$, $|a|$ always exists and is non-negative.

So all you need is $\frac{2-x}{x+3}$ to be well defined. Which translates to $x \neq -3$.

share|improve this answer
    
Sure? I have some exercises on absolute value that take an entire page... Is unnecessary to study the absolute value? –  Overflowh Jan 26 '12 at 20:07
    
@unNaturhal: I was talking about the extra constraints you need to add (and which is all you asked in the question, didn't you?). You still have to solve the whole thing... –  Aryabhata Jan 26 '12 at 20:09
    
Yes I know that is necessary to solve the whole thing, but the existence field of the fraction I know that is $x\neq3$, but isn't the same of the absolute value, right? –  Overflowh Jan 26 '12 at 20:13
    
@unNaturhal: I don't understand what you are trying to ask. If $x \neq -3$, then $|\frac{2-x}{x+3}|$ is always well defined. –  Aryabhata Jan 26 '12 at 20:15
    
Damned absolute values... I really cannot understand :/ –  Overflowh Jan 26 '12 at 21:13

We first do it in a slow and tedious way, and then a quick way. For the $\arccos$ to be defined, we need $\frac{|2-x|}{|3+x|} \le 1$ (it is naturally non-negative).

Thus we need the inequality $|2-x|\le |x+3|$. First suppose that $x \ge 2$. Then $|2-x|=x-2$, so we want $x-2 \le x+3$, which is true.

For $-3 <x<2$, we have $|2-x|=2-x$ and $|x+3|=x+3$. So we want $2-x\le x+3$, that is, $x \ge -1/2$.

At $x=-3$ things are clearly bad. But also if $x<-3$, then $|2-x|=2-x$ and $|x+3|=-(3+x)$. Thus our inequality becomes $2-x \le -(3+x)$, which is false.

To sum up, the $\arccos$ part is defined if $x\ge -1/2$.

Now we worry about the bottom. The function $x^2-4x+5$ is always positive, no trouble there. We want to make sure that $x^2-4x+5\ne 9$. We have equality at $-1$ and $5$, but $-1$ has already been ruled out.

Conclusion: Our function is defined for all $x\ge -1/2$ except $x=5$.

A quick way: The inequality $|2-x|\le |3+x|$ is equivalent to $(2-x)^2\le (3+x)^2$. Expand. The $x^2$'s cancel, and we get $x\ge -\frac{5}{10}$.

The tedious breaking up into cases of the first solution is unfortunately a useful tool in dealing with absolute value problems. The slick procedure of the "quick" solution is often much messier than doing things by cases.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.