Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What's the difference between optional quadratic variation (which sometimes is denoted by $ [M]$) and predictable quadratic variation (i.e $\ < M > $) of a stochastic process?

share|cite|improve this question
See also this question: – saz Mar 23 '15 at 16:22
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Hi here are my two cents :

$<>$ is the predictable compensator of $[]$ process ( so the difference of both is a local martingale).

The difference is best illustrated by examining a Poisson process of intensity $\lambda$.

Then the $[N]_t=\sum_{s\le t}(\Delta N_s)^2=\sum_{s\le t}(\Delta N_s)=N_t$ this process is not predictable as its jumps are inaccessible.

But $<N>_t=\lambda.t$ (comes from standard calculations) this process is predictable as it is deterministic.

And finally $[N]_t-<N>_t=N_t -\lambda.t$ is a (local) martingale.

You should take a look at George Lowther fantastic Blog "almost sure"

Best regards

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.