Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

prove that $\mathbb{C}$ and $\mathbb{R}$ are not isomorphic as rings

My guess is that the proof for this has something to do with the fact that $\sqrt{-1}\in\mathbb{C}$ cannot be mapped to $\mathbb{R}$.

share|improve this question
2  
Not isomorphic as what? Additive groups? Rings? Vector spaces over $\mathbb{Q}$? Vector spaces over $\mathbb{R}$? –  Arturo Magidin Jan 23 '12 at 20:45
    
In which category? –  Norbert Jan 23 '12 at 20:46
    
As rings -- just edited. –  Emir Jan 23 '12 at 20:46
2  
you guessed it right... What is $(\sqrt{-1})^2+1$ in $C$? Where would it be mapped by a ring isomorphism? –  N. S. Jan 23 '12 at 20:48
1  
@Dylan: Or $\mathbb{Q}-\mathbf{VectorSpace}$... –  Arturo Magidin Jan 23 '12 at 20:48
show 7 more comments

2 Answers 2

If $f\colon\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}$ is a ring homomorphism, then since $f(1)=f(1^2) = f(1)^2$, we must have either $f(1)=1$ or $f(1)=0$.

If $f(1)=0$, then $f(\mathbb{C})=\{0\}$.

If $f(1)=1$, then what is $f(-1)$? And what is $f(i)$?

share|improve this answer
add comment

It depends on what kind of isomorphism you are looking for. Certainly they are not isomorphic as rings. The argument is not hard to write out, and starts from your observation.

Suppose to the contrary that $\phi$ is a ring isomorphism from $\mathbb{C}$ to $\mathbb{R}$. Note that $\phi(1)=1$, and therefore $\phi(-1)=-1$.

Let $\phi(i)=a$. Then $\phi(i \cdot i)=\phi(-1)=-1$. But also $\phi(i\cdot i)=a^2\ne -1$.

However, $\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathbb{C}$ are isomorphic as groups under addition. We can also view each of them as a vector space over the field $\mathbb{Q}$ of rational numbers. They are isomorphic as vector spaces over $\mathbb{Q}$.

share|improve this answer
    
Isomorphic as vector spaces over $\mathbb{Q}$, yes... but not over $\mathbb{R}$ (just to clarify). –  Skolem Jan 23 '12 at 21:30
    
@Skolem: Thanks, I said it once, should have said it twice. –  André Nicolas Jan 23 '12 at 21:36
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.