Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose we have $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ i.i.d, $X_i \sim Exp(1, \mu)$ (pdf is $f_\mu(x) = e^{-(x-\mu)}$ for $x \geq \mu$ and $0$ for $x < \mu$). Is there any one dimensional (i.e. $T: \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$) sufficient statistic for parameter $\mu$? Obvious two dimensional sufficient statistic is $T(x_1, \ldots, x_n) = (\sum x_i, \min x_i)$, but I have a hard time finding one dimensional statistic.

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 2 down vote accepted

The likelihood of an i.i.d. sample $x=(x_i)_{1\leqslant i\leqslant n}$ of distribution $\mathcal E(1,\mu)$ is $$ L(\mu,x)=\exp(-s(x)+n\mu)\cdot[t(x)\geqslant\mu], $$ where $s(x)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^nx_i$ and $t(x)=\min\limits_{1\leqslant i\leqslant n}x_i$. This is $$ L(\mu,x)=h(x)g(\mu,t(x)), $$ with $h(x)=\exp(-s(x))$ and $g(m,u)=\exp(nm)\cdot[u\geqslant m]$ hence $t:x\mapsto t(x)=\min\limits_{1\leqslant i\leqslant n}x_i$ is a sufficient statistic for $\mu$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

We have $$L(x_1,\dots,x_n,\mu)=\prod_{j=1}^ne^{-(x_j-\mu)}\mathbf 1_{[\mu,+\infty[}(x_j)=e^{-n\bar x}\cdot e^{n\mu}\mathbf 1_{[\mu,+\infty[}\left(\min_{1\leq j\leq n}x_k\right),$$ so by Fischer-Neyman's theorems, $\varphi(x_1,\ldots,x_n)=\min_{1\leq j\leq n}x_j$ is a sufficient statistic.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.