Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

While reading through several articles concerned with mathematical constants, I kept on finding things like this:

The continued fraction for $\mu$(Soldner's Constant) is given by $\left[1, 2, 4, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1, 1, 1, 2, 47, 2, ...\right]$.

The high-water marks are 1, 2, 4, 47, 99, 294, 527, 616, 1152, ... , which occur at positions 1, 2, 3, 12, 70, 126, 202, 585, 1592, ... .

(copied from here)

I didn't find a definition of high-water marks in the web, so I assume that it's a listing of increasing largest integers, while going through the continued fraction expansion.

Is this correct and is there special meaing behind them?

share|cite|improve this question
The convergents at the high-water marks are exceptionally accurate approximations. – Brian M. Scott Jan 21 '12 at 19:39
Probably "high-water mark" means a number larger than any that come before it in the sequence. – Michael Hardy Jan 22 '12 at 2:10
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Your definition seems correct to me -- at least, it agrees with the data you've provided and with my intuition, as a native speaker of English, of how this phrase is used. I don't know of a specific significance of these high-water marks, but it's well-known that cutting off a continued fraction expansion just before a particularly large coefficient gives a good rational approximation to the number being expanded. For example the sequence of convergents of π begins 3, 7, 15, 1, 292; the continued fraction [3, 7, 15, 1] is the well-known, surprisingly good approximation 355/113.

share|cite|improve this answer

Truncating a continued fraction right before a "high-water" (large) partial quotient $\rm\: a_{i+1}\:$ yields a particularly good rational approximation since

$$\rm r\ =\ [a_0;\ a_1;\ a_2;\ \cdots\ ]\ \ \Rightarrow\ \ \left|\ r\ -\ \frac{p_i}{q_i}\:\right|\ \le\: \frac{1}{a_{i+1}\:q_i^2}$$

For example

$$\rm \pi\ =\ [3;\ 7;\ 15;\ 1;\ 292;\ \cdots\ ]\ \ \Rightarrow \ \ \left|\ \pi - \frac{355}{113}\:\right|\ \le\: \frac{1}{292\cdot 113^2}\: =\ 2.68\cdot 10^{-7}$$

In fact we have $\rm\quad \pi\ -\ \dfrac{355}{113}\ =\ {-}2.67\cdot 10^{-7}\:.$

share|cite|improve this answer

The term comes from the common practice of marking bridges or walls with the water level and date during big floods. So, you can look at these high-water marks to see that in 1985, the river flooded to 5 feet above its current level. If you come back a decade later, you may find that a new high-water mark has surpassed it.

I haven't seen the term "high-water marks" for continued fractions before (but I like the name).

I'm sure your interpretation is correct: the $n$th coefficient $a_n$ is a high-water mark if $a_n>a_i$ for $i<n$.

(Maybe it also qualifies if $a_n \geq a_i$ for $i<n$? You would have to find a definition or example to settle that question for sure.)

One significance of a high-water mark at position $n$ is that the $(n-1)$st and $n$th convergents will be big improvements in accuracy. For example, $\pi$ is given by [3;7,15,1,292,...]. In the step before including 292, you go from convergent 333/106=3.14150... to 355/113=3.1415929... When you include 292, you get 103993/33102=3.1415926530..., gaining 2 or 3 more accurate digits each time.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.