Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $u$ be in the Sobolev space $H^2$. Then the standard definition of the norm is $$ ||u||_{H^2}^2 = \sum_{|\alpha| \leq 2} ||D^{\alpha} u||_{L^2}^2. $$

However, I have also seen it defined this way $$ ||u||_{H^2}^2 = ||u||_{L^2}^2 + \sum_{|\alpha| = 2} ||D^{\alpha} u||_{L^2}^2. $$

Are these two norms equivalent? Clearly, the latter is $\leq$ the former. To get an ineqaulity the other way, is the Poincare inequality used?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

In the other direction, use an interpolation inequality of the form $$ \sum_{|\alpha|=1}\|D^\alpha u\|_{L^2}^2\leq A \|u\|_{L^2}^2 + B \sum_{|\alpha|=2}\|D^\alpha u\|_{L^2}^2 $$

where $A$ and $B$ are constants.

share|cite|improve this answer

It's possible Poincaré inequality may not be true, for example if you work on $\mathbb R^n$. However, as @timur says, we have if $u\in\mathcal D(\mathbb R^n)$ $$||D^{e_i}u||_{L^2}^2=\int_{\mathbb R^n}D^{e_i}uD^{e_i}udx=-\int_{\mathbb R^n}uD^{2e_i}udx\leq ||u||_{L^2}||D^{2e_i}u||_{L^2}\leq \frac 12(||u||_{L^2}^2+||D^{2e_i}u||^2_{L^2}),$$ hence by a density argument $$\sum_{|\alpha|=1}||D^{\alpha}u||_{L^2}^2\leq \frac n2||u||_{L^2}+\frac 12\sum_{|\alpha|=2}||D^{\alpha}u||_{L^2}^2.$$ So, if we put $N_1(u)^2:=\sum_{|\alpha|\leq 2}||D^{\alpha}u||_{L^2}^2$ and $N_2(u)^2=||u||_{L^2}^2+\sum_{|\alpha|=2}||D^{\alpha}u||_{L^2}^2$ we have $$N_2(u)\leq N_1(u)\leq N_1(u)+\frac n2||u||_{L^2}+\sum_{|\alpha|=2}||D^{\alpha}u||_{L^2}^2\leq \left(1+\max\left\{1,\frac n2\right\}\right)N_2(u)$$ for all $u\in H^2(\mathbb R^n)$.

share|cite|improve this answer

As both are Banach spaces with the respective norm, and the second is $\geq$ than the first, then by the Banach's theorem applied to the identity (The inverse of an invertible bounded linear operator between Banach spaces is continuous) both are equivalent.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.