Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

(see bottom for apology)

Let $Y$ be the plane curve $y = x^2$ (i.e., $Y$ is the zero set of the polynomial $f = y - x^2$). Show that $A(Y)$ is isomorphic to a polynomial ring in one variable over $K$.

In case the notation is non-standard, let $A = k[x_1, ... , x_n]$. Then $A(Y) = A / I(Y)$ is the affine coordinate ring of an algebraic subset $Y \subseteq \mathbb A^n$, where $I(Y) = \{ f \in A | f(P) = 0 \ \forall P \in Y\}$.


My initial thoughts:

I can use the information in the question to help me; I know in advance that $A(Y)$ is going to be generated by one of its elements (as a $k$-algebra). I'd like to see what the elements of $A(Y)$ look like, as this will help me to find a generator.

My attempt:

I'm quotienting out by $I(Y) = I(Z(\mathfrak{a})) = \sqrt{\mathfrak{a}}$ (Hilbert's Nullstellensatz), where $\mathfrak{a}$ is the ideal generated by $f$. It'd be nice if $\mathfrak{a}$ was a radical ideal. Suppose $g \in \sqrt{\mathfrak{a}}$. Then $g^r \in \mathfrak{a}$ for some positive integer $r$, i.e. $g(x,y)^r = h(x,y)(y-x^2)$ for some $h(x,y) \in A$. Since $(y-x^2)$ is irreducible in $A$ and it divides $g(x,y)^r$, it must divide $g(x,y)$, and so $g(x,y) \in \mathfrak{a}$. So I have that $I(Y) = \mathfrak{a}$. [if this method is correct, it can be generalised to show that an ideal of $A$ generated by an irreducible is radical]

So elements of $A(Y)$ are of the form $p(x,y) + \langle y-x^2 \rangle$. Notice that $(x + \langle y-x^2\rangle)^2 = x^2 + \langle y-x^2 \rangle = x^2 + y - x^2 + \langle y - x^2 \rangle = y + \langle y - x^2 \rangle$. Thus $x + \langle y - x^2 \rangle$ is a generator of $A(Y)$.

Let $\phi : A(Y) \to k[z]$ be the $k$-linear map specified by sending $x + \langle y - x^2 \rangle $ to $z$. This is an isomorphism of $k$-algebras.


I promise I won't ask about every exercise in this book; I just want to make sure I'm approaching the topic in the right way. Obviously what appears above isn't how I'd structure a proper solution - I included my thought processes where possible in the hope that someone might tell me I'm thinking about this in the right/wrong way.

Thanks a lot.

share|improve this question
    
You are right. I think it's easier to think in the canonical inclusion, that is $k[x]\to k[x,y]\to A(Y)$. Also, the Lin's comments are very good. Lucky with item (c)! –  emiliocba Jan 21 '12 at 1:47
    
How do you know that $\phi$ is an isomorphism? (Even true things can be proved.) –  Dylan Moreland Jan 21 '12 at 3:05
    
@DylanMoreland Isn't it? I can't see why it isn't, when expressing elements of $A(Y)$ as polynomials in $x + \langle y - x^2 \rangle $ . –  Matt Jan 21 '12 at 3:09
3  
«I can't see why it isn't» is not the same thing as being able to prove it is! –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jan 21 '12 at 4:07

2 Answers 2

up vote 7 down vote accepted

Why don't we approach this geometrically? Let us exhibit an isomorphism between $\mathbb{A}^1$ and the parabola $Y$. This is easy enough: the map $t \mapsto (t, t^2)$ is one direction and the projection $(x, y) \mapsto x$ is the other. This implies that $A(Y) \cong A(\mathbb{A}^1) \cong k[t]$, where the isomorphism takes $x \mapsto t$ and $y \mapsto t^2$.

More generally, if we have a morphism $\varphi : X \to Y$, there is a homomorphism $\varphi^* : A(Y) \to A(X)$ defined by $\varphi^*(f) = f \circ \varphi$. Explicitly in terms of generators and coordinates, if $Y \subseteq \mathbb{A}^n$ and $X \subseteq \mathbb{A}^m$ and we write $\varphi_1, \ldots, \varphi_n$ for the components of $\varphi$, $x_1, \ldots, x_m$ for the coordinate functions of $X$, and $y_1, \ldots, y_n$ for the coordinates functions of $Y$, then $\varphi^*$ has $$\varphi^*(y_j) = \varphi_j (x_1, \ldots, x_m)$$ and this data suffices to determine $\varphi^*$ because $y_1, \ldots, y_n$ generate $A(Y)$.


Of course, you probably aren't supposed to use morphisms of varieties yet. In that case the only real difficulty in the whole exercise is establishing that $A(Y) \cong k[x, y] / (y - x^2)$. But this follows from these easy facts:

  1. $y - x^2$ is an irreducible polynomial in $k[x, y]$.

  2. The principal ideal generated by an irreducible element of a UFD is prime.

  3. $k[x, y]$ is a UFD.

  4. A prime ideal is radical.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, I'll come back to the first half of your answer once I've read the section on morphisms. My answer uses (though they're not very explicitly stated, I admit) those four facts, which is comforting I suppose. –  Matt Jan 21 '12 at 1:45

Let $K$ be a commutative ring, and let $X,Y,T$ be indeterminates. By the universal property of polynomial algebras, there are unique $K$-algebra morphisms $$ c:K[T]\to K[X,Y],\quad p:K[X,Y]\to K[T] $$ satisfying $$ c(T)=X,\quad p(X)=T,\quad p(Y)=T^2. $$ Let $$ \pi:K[X,Y]\to\frac{K[X,Y]}{(Y-X^2)} $$ be the canonical projection. We claim

(A) $\ p$ induces a $K$-algebra morphism $$ \overline p:\frac{K[X,Y]}{(Y-X^2)}\to K[T], $$ (B) $\ \overline p$ and $\pi\circ c:K[T]\to K[X,Y]/(Y-X^2)$ are inverse $K$-algebra isomorphisms.

The proof is straightforward.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.