Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

It is known that the probability density function $f(x)$ and the cumulative distribution function $F(x)$ are related as $f(x) = \frac{\partial F(x)}{\partial x}$. However I am confused why at some places the density function is written as just $dF(x)$.

This came up in the definition of Stieltjes Transform: $m(z) = \int \frac{1}{x - z} dF(x)$. And it is mentioned that

The density function $f(x) := dF(x)$ in the distributional sense

Is this just the issue with notation or is there specific reason to write the density function as $dF(x)$?

share|improve this question
    
There may not be an everywhere defined density function. –  André Nicolas Jan 20 '12 at 20:48
    
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… –  Qiaochu Yuan Jan 20 '12 at 20:49
    
In this instance, it is sort of short for $\frac{dF(x)}{dx} dx$ - that is, the integral is really: $\int \frac{f(x)}{x-z} dx$, but they are writing $f(x)dx = dF(x)$ as a shorthand notation and, perhaps, for clarity. –  Thomas Andrews Jan 20 '12 at 21:03
    
@ThomasAndrews Ok. Does the term 'in distributional sense' have any specific meaning? I have also seen 'distributional derivative' term being used. Do these terms mean something? –  sauravrt Jan 20 '12 at 21:46
    
@AndréNicolas Like atomic density functions? –  sauravrt Jan 20 '12 at 21:47

1 Answer 1

up vote 0 down vote accepted

I think it's a notation thing. Maybe like the notation for a differential operator.

share|improve this answer
    
This should have been a comment. –  Sasha Jan 20 '12 at 21:52

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.