Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $G$ be a group and $H$ be a subgroup of $G$. When is $\rm{Aut}(H)$ a subgroup of $\rm{Aut}(G)$?

share|cite|improve this question
10  
Generally speaking a question of this type has a shot at a reasonable answer if there is a canonical map $\text{Aut}(H) \to \text{Aut}(G)$ and you want to ask when this map is injective. But in this case there is no such map. Instead there is a canonical map the other way from the subgroup of automorphisms of $G$ preserving $H$ to the group of automorphisms of $H$. So it's not clear to me what you want: do you just want to know when there exists, abstractly, an injection of $\text{Aut}(H)$ into $\text{Aut}(G)$? Do you want this injection to land only in the subgroup of $\text{Aut}(G)$... – Qiaochu Yuan Jan 20 '12 at 6:30
5  
...which preserves $H$ and to respect the action on $H$? (That would require that you could somehow extend automorphisms of $H$ to automorphisms of $G$ in some reasonable way.) There are lots of things you could want and I doubt there is an easy answer to any of the possible forms of this question. – Qiaochu Yuan Jan 20 '12 at 6:31
3  
@Ali Gholamian: Please consider registering in the site; that will make it easier to keep track of your questions. – Arturo Magidin Jan 20 '12 at 16:17
    
@Ali Gholamian: As above, there is a lot of thing this qestion brings here. You certainly know that $\mathbb{Z}_{6}$ and $\mathbb{Z}_{3}$ know just one group as their Automorphism Group. – Babak S. Jan 21 '12 at 15:14
1  
A partial but also quite trivial answer to this question is: If $\text{Out}(H)=0$, then $\text{Aut}(H)=\text{Inn}(H) \leq \text{Inn}(G) \leq \text{Aut}(G)$. – Nex Oct 17 '15 at 21:47

The restriction of an automorphism of G to H is an automorphism of H requires that H is a characteristic sub-groupe in G, in this case the restriction morphism of Aut (G) to Aut (H) has a sense and is an epimorphism. In this cas it is hoped that Aut (G) is a direct product of Aut (H) ie the exacte sequence

I said that a sufficient condition for the $Aut(H)$ to be injected into $Aut(G)$ is that $H$ a characteristic subgroup in $G$ and the exact short sequence: $ ker(rest) \hookrightarrow Aut(G)\rightarrow Aut(H)$(this last morphism is the epimorphism restriction) split. Then a partial answer that I deduced from the last comment given to this issue as similar question in terms of exact short sequence of groups is this: under the condition H to be a direct factor of G and simultaneously a characteristic subgroup in G, then $Aut(H)$ is injected into $Aut(G)$. This injection may in no case be canonical (as Aut (.) Is not a functor), but the restriction is canonical and has a sense here because H supposed characteristic.

Prove: Suppose $G=H\times K$ and $H$ characteristic in $G$, so the restriction morphism $Aut(G)\rightarrow Aut(H)$ is an epimorphism $f\mapsto f_H $, it can viewed in this situation as the composite morphism $p_H\circ f\circ i_H : H\hookrightarrow H\times K \rightarrow H\times K\times \rightarrow H $ where $i_H$ the canonical monomorphism,$f\in Aut(H\times K)$ and $p_H$ the canonical projection. Since $H$ characteristic in $H\times K$ then $K$ is also characteristic in $H\times K$ because for any $f\in Aut(H\times K)$ the composite morphism $p_K\circ f$ left via the naturel projection $p_K:H\times K\rightarrow K$. and so we obtained the direct product $Aut(H\times K)\simeq Aut(H)\times Aut(K)$ with the isomorphism restriction $f\mapsto (f_H,f_K)$ and of course the already exact short sequence split.

share|cite|improve this answer
    
there are error in the kernel i am sorry, The kernel is not o but the sub-group of aut(G) that have restrection to H the identite of H. so the conclusion is not true but speking Aut(H) sub-groupe of Aut(G) requires H characteristic and the obouve exacte sequence split, thanks – m.idaya May 23 at 20:45
    
It is not true that the restriction of an automorphism of $G$ to $H$ being an automorphism of $H$ requires $H$ to be characteristic. – Morgan Rodgers May 23 at 21:08
    
I mean all automorphisms of G for have the morphism from Aut (G) in the Aut(H) by restriction. I have problem to translat my idea in english. Sorry and thanks – m.idaya May 23 at 21:16
    
As a non-trivial example, take G a finite nilpotent group and H a p-Sylow subgroup of G then $Aut(H)$ is a direct product factor of $Aut(G)$ – m.idaya May 26 at 6:37

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.