Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am writing something about the following two theorems:

  1. Every function $f: \Bbb{R} \to \Bbb{R}$ can be written $f=f_1+f_2$ where $f_1,f_2:\Bbb{R} \to \Bbb{R}$ both have the Darboux property.

  2. Denote (C) the Cauchy functional equation: $$ f: \Bbb{R} \to \Bbb{R}, \ f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$$ Prove that every solution of (C) ca be written $f=f_1+f_2$ where $f_1,f_2$ are (discontinuous) solutions of (C) which have the Darboux property.

How can I find the papers where the original proofs of these theorem first appeared. I tried googling, but Wikipedia doesn't work today. If the original articles aren't available, then maybe there are some books which contain the proof of the first theorem; those are good also. I only know a Romanian reference where the proof appears, but I would like to know a known English book which contains the proof. Thank you.

I found the second theorem in a problem book, and maybe it is more recent than the first one.

share|improve this question
    
Regarding Wikipedia, you can use Google caches, or disable scripting in your browser. Have you tried Google Scholar and Google Books? –  Jonas Meyer Jan 18 '12 at 17:46
    
reference-request should not be used as a standalone tag; see tag-wiki and meta. –  Martin Sleziak Feb 1 '13 at 8:38

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Wikipedia provides a reference for the first theorem:

Bruckner, Andrew M: Differentiation of real functions, 2 ed, page 6, American Mathematical Society, 1994

Probably not the best approach, but you could check that book and try to backtrack the Theorem.

share|improve this answer

I followed advice given by N.S. and looked what A. M. Bruckner says about the origin of the first theorem from your question. (I still don't have anything to say about the second one.) However, I've noticed that you've found a different paper by Sierpiński which you mention in your paper.


Andrew M. Bruckner. Differentiation of Real Functions (LNM659, Springer, 1978). BTW there is also a newer edition of this book, but both editions say the same thing regarding the above theorem, see here.

Theorem 4.1. Let $f$ be an arbitrary function on $\mathbb R$. There exist two Darboux functions $g$ and $h$ such that $f=g+h$.

Theorem 4.2. Let $f$ be an arbitrary function on $\mathbb R$. There exists a sequence $\{f_n\}$ of Darboux functions converging pointwise to $f$.

Theorems 4.1 and 4.2 were first announced by Lindenbaum [121]. A clever proof can be found in Fast [59].

A. M. Bruckner and J. Ceder: On the Sum of Darboux Functions; Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , Vol. 51, No. 1 (Aug., 1975), pp. 97-102 jstor.

In recent years a number of articles have dealt with questions concerning the possible outcomes of adding two real functions with the Darboux property (i.e. the intermediate value property). For example, Sierpiński [8] (see also Fast [4]) showed that in the absence of further conditions on the functions, every function is the sum of two such (Darboux) functions.

The articles referenced in the above excerpts are:

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you very much for your answer. –  Beni Bogosel Apr 28 '12 at 9:17
    
@Beni I've seen the result that there are solutions of Cauchy equation such that $f[I]=\mathbb R$ for each interval, which is an interesting fact and the proof is nice. Didn't you consider posting this proof or link to your paper here or here. –  Martin Sleziak May 9 '12 at 15:33
    
I thought my result was new, but I found some time ago essentially the same construction in a paper from the 60s of Bruckner. –  Beni Bogosel May 9 '12 at 18:56
    
And also, I think that one of the answers on the MathOverflow presents the proof in my article. –  Beni Bogosel May 9 '12 at 19:01
    
You mean Jim Belk's answer, right? His function is also additive and constant on every coset $x+\mathbb Q$. (I did not notice that these constructions are related until you pointed it out.) –  Martin Sleziak May 10 '12 at 4:44

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.