Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know this must be easy. I'm new to modules, so perhaps I must be missing something important.

Let $M$ be an $R$-module. Show that if there exists a submodule $N$ such that $N$ and $M/N$ are finitely generated, then $M$ is finitely generated.

If the exact sequence $0 \longrightarrow N \longrightarrow M \longrightarrow M/N \longrightarrow 0 $ (where the second and third arrows are inclusion and projection respectively) splits then $M$ would be isomorphic to the direct sum of $M$ and $M/N$ and the conclusion would follow (I think). But I can't show that it splits.

Thank you.

share|improve this question
2  
Can you do it for vector spaces? –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jan 18 '12 at 2:06
1  
By the way, the sequence does not split in general! It is therefore good that you were not able to prove it does :) –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jan 18 '12 at 4:03
    
@Mariano: thank you. What's an example that it doesn't split? –  Weltschmerz Jan 18 '12 at 12:35
    
@Dylan: Thank you. The first map, though, is not inclusion... –  Weltschmerz Jan 18 '12 at 22:22

2 Answers 2

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Take a generating set $\{\bar z_1, \ldots, \bar z_m\}$ for $M/N$. If $x$ is an element of $M$, then there exist $a_1, \ldots, a_n \in R$ such that the image $\bar x$ of $x$ in $M/N$ is \[ \bar x = a_1\bar z_1 + \cdots + a_n\bar z_n. \] Since the map on the right is surjective, you can choose lifts $\{z_1, \ldots, z_m\}$ in $M$ of the aforementioned generating set. Now, the element \[ x' = a_1z_1 + \cdots + a_nz_n \] has the same image as $x$ in $M/N$. Do you see a way to use the exactness in the middle?

Note that the sequence need not split: consider the $\mathbf Z$-submodule $2\mathbf Z$ of $\mathbf Z$.

share|improve this answer

Perhaps this works?

Suppose $M/N$ is finitely generated with generators $a_1+N,\dots,a_m+N$, and $N$ is finitely generated with generators $b_1,\dots,b_n$. Take any $m\in M$. Then $m+N=\sum_{i=1}^m r_i(a_i+N)=\left(\sum_{i=1}^m r_ia_i\right)+N$ viewing $M/N$ as an $R$-module.

This implies $m-\sum_{i=1}^m r_ia_i\in N$, and thus $m-\sum_{i=1}^m r_ia_i=\sum_{j=1}^n s_jb_j$ for some $r_i,s_j\in R$. Finally, $m=\sum_{i=1}^m r_ia_i+\sum_{j=1}^n s_jb_j$. So $M$ is generated by $a_i, b_j$ for $i=1,\dots, m$ and $j=1,\dots n$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.