6
$\begingroup$

Prove Lagrange's Identity without induction.

$$ \sum_{1\leq j <k\leq n}(a_jb_k-a_kb_j)^2=\left( \sum_{k=1}^na_k^2 \right)\left( \sum_{k=1}^n b_k^2 \right)-\left( \sum_{k=1}^na_kb_k \right)^2 $$

I tried expanding the left side but I could never get anywhere, I'm looking for some tips on how to get started on the right direction, not complete solutions.

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ To get an idea of how the land lies try small values of $n$. Say $n=2$. May be also $n=3$? You will see what kind of cancellations will/should occur. $\endgroup$ Jun 21, 2015 at 7:09

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

Hint:

You have to play with the indices. Develop the sum of squares, first removing the condition $j<k$ and replacing by $j\neq k$ (this will cancel out a factor $2$), then note the case $j=k$ brings in no supplementary term. When all conditions on $j$ and $k$ have been removed, it is easy to factorise.

$$ \sum_{1\le j < k\le n}(a_jb_k- a_kb_j)^2 = \sum_{1\le j < k\le n}(a_jb_k)^2 -2\sum_{1\le j < k\le n} a_j a_k b_j b_k + \sum_{1\le j < k\le n}(a_kb_j)^2 $$ Note that $\displaystyle\sum\limits_{1\le j < k\le n}(a_jb_k)^2 + \sum\limits_{1\le j < k\le n}(a_kb_j)^2 $ can be written as $\displaystyle\sum\limits_{1\le j\neq k\le n}(a_jb_k)^2 $.

Also $\, \displaystyle 2\!\!\!\sum\limits_{1\le j < k\le n} a_j a_k b_jb_k =\!\!\!\sum\limits_{1\le j \neq k\le n} a_j a_k b_jb_k $ , so that our sum of squares is $\displaystyle\sum\limits_{1\le j\neq k\le n}(a_jb_k)^2 -\sum\limits_{1\le j \neq k\le n} a_j a_k b_jb_k $

Finally, note that in the last formula, for $ j = k$ the terms would cancel, since their contribution would be equal to $$\sum\limits_{1\le j\le n}(a_jb_j)^2 -\sum\limits_{1\le j \le n} a_j^2 b_j^2$$ Thus, we can incorporate the case $j=k$ to our original sum of squares, which will finally be equal to: \begin{align*}\sum_{1\le j, k\le n}(a_jb_k)^2 -\sum_{1\le j ,k\le n} a_j b_j a_k b_k& =\sum_{1\le j\le n}a_j^2\sum_{1\le j\le n}b_j^2 -\Bigl(\sum_{1\le j \le n} a_j b_j\Bigr)\Bigl(\sum_{1\le j \le n} a_j b_j\Bigr)\\&=\sum_{1\le j\le n}a_j^2\sum_{1\le j\le n}b_j^2 -\Bigl(\sum_{1\le j \le n} a_j b_j\Bigr)^2 \end{align*}

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Could you elaborate on how to do all that? I'm new to manipulating indices of multiple summations so this is kind of hard. $\endgroup$ May 21, 2015 at 0:43
  • $\begingroup$ @YoTengoUnLCD: I added some details. $\endgroup$
    – Bernard
    May 21, 2015 at 1:45
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot man! Took me a while but I could understand it. Is there any way to prove a bit more rigorously the of "these terms cancel out" and all those bits? $\endgroup$ May 22, 2015 at 20:52
  • $\begingroup$ See my updated answer. Is that clearer? $\endgroup$
    – Bernard
    May 22, 2015 at 21:10
0
$\begingroup$

Both expressions are of the form $\sum_{\substack{i \leq j \\ k \leq \ell}} C_{i,j,k,\ell} a_i a_j b_k b_\ell$, and you can compute the coefficient of $a_i a_j b_k b_\ell$ on both sides, showing that it is equal in all cases.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .